History
  • No items yet
midpage
2015 IL App (1st) 123306
Ill. App. Ct.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Arnold and Arthur Lynch held the property as joint tenants with equal undivided interests.
  • Arnold was adjudicated disabled in 2002; Brya was appointed plenary guardian of Arnold’s estate.
  • In 2005, Arnold (via his guardian) and Arthur sold the Lynch home to Adame by warranty deed; Brya attended but did not sign.
  • PNTN prepared the title packet; Arnold’s guardianship was not disclosed in the title commitment.
  • Sale proceeds were disbursed to Brya and to Arnold/Arthur; probate court not informed or involved in the sale or disbursement.
  • Arnold died intestate in 2006; litigation followed via citations to recover assets in 2009; circuit court held the conveyance void ab initio and title restored to the estates.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Arnold’s conveyance, but not Arthur’s, was void ab initio Arnold lacked capacity; Arnold’s conveyance void Arthur’s conveyance could be valid independent of Arnold Arnold’s conveyance void; Arthur’s conveyance valid
Whether Arthur’s conveyance to Adame was valid notwithstanding Arnold’s void conveyance Entire sale void due to same deed Arthur’s conveyance independent; not voided by Arnold’s disability Arthur’s conveyance valid; Adame holds Arnold’s interest as tenant in common with Adame
Application of after-acquired title doctrine May vest fee simple in Adame after Arnold’s incapacity Doctrine not applicable; Arthur conveyed only his interest Doctrine not applicable; did not vest title in Adame
Status of ownership after severance of joint tenancy Sale severed joint tenancy with Arnold’s interest Arthur’s conveyance severed the tenancy; creates tenancy in common Arthur severed joint tenancy; Adame and Arnold’s estate are tenants in common
Entitlement to monetary relief for Adame (reimbursement/setoff) Adame seeks return of purchase price and other expenditures Remedy unsettled; issues remanded for setoff/abatement Remanded to determine bona fide purchaser status and possible monetary relief

Key Cases Cited

  • Ure v. Ure, 223 Ill. 454 (1906) (voidable contract with guardian; effect on sale of joint tenancy)
  • Ennis v. Johnson, 3 Ill. 2d 383 (1954) (severance of joint tenancy when one cotenant conveys his interest)
  • Hosty v. Kroupa, 117 Ill. App. 2d 419 (1969) (sale conditioned on joint tenancy interests; cannot enforce without both signatures)
  • Dineff v. Wernecke, 27 Ill. 2d 476 (1963) (mutual intention to purchase all interests; contract not formed if signatures missing)
  • Jordan v. Kirkpatrick, 251 Ill. 116 (1911) (insane at time of note/mortgage; enforceability against spouse's participation)
  • Sathoff v. Sutterer, 373 Ill. App. 3d 795 (2007) (joint tenancy severance by unilateral conveyance; survivorship implications)
  • Ure v. Ure, 223 Ill. 454 (1906) (repeat to emphasize guardian conveyance effects)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Harris v. Adame
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Jan 29, 2016
Citations: 2015 IL App (1st) 123306; 43 N.E.3d 1050; 398 Ill.Dec. 140; 1-12-3306, 1-12-3307 cons.
Docket Number: 1-12-3306, 1-12-3307 cons.
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
Log In
    Harris v. Adame, 2015 IL App (1st) 123306