History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hard Drive Productions, Inc. v. DOES 1-188
809 F. Supp. 2d 1150
N.D. Cal.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Hard Drive Productions filed a copyright suit against 188 Does based on BitTorrent sharing of Amateur Allure Erin in the N.D. Cal.
  • Plaintiff sought expedited discovery to identify Does by subpoenaing ISPs for names, addresses, and MAC addresses.
  • Court granted leave to take discovery prior to Rule 26(f) conference, with notices to subscribers to object or move to quash.
  • Doe 24.5.180.56 moved to quash, challenging joinder, reliability of IP/MAC tracing, and copyright registration plausibility.
  • Plaintiff later voluntarily dismissed Does 1-5; the action against the remaining Doe Defendant and subpoenas evolved.
  • Magistrate judge explained jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636 and § 636(c) given non-service status of Does.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Rule 20(a) joinder is proper for BitTorrent Does Joinder is proper; Does are logically related via same File/Swarm process. Joinder is improper; BitTorrent does not prove a single transaction or common occurrence. Joinder is improper under Rule 20(a)(2).
Whether the court should sever and dismiss all but one Doe Severance would undermine plaintiff’s ability to pursue claims efficiently; many Ds may share defenses. Severance would prejudice defendants and complicate proceedings. Court discretion to sever; sever all Does except one and dismiss severed claims without prejudice.
Whether the subpoenas may be quashed for Doe 24.5.180.56 Quashing general injunctions would hamper discovery; Doe remains part of the case. Subpoena should be quashed due to unreliable IP/MAC tracing and improper joinder. Motion to Quash granted as to Doe 24.5.180.56; subpoenas for other Does were quashed as severed/withdrawn.

Key Cases Cited

  • United Mine Workers of Am. v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (U.S. Supreme Court 1966) (broad scope of action encouraged; joinder goals)
  • Call of the Wild Movie, LLC v. Does 1-1062, 770 F. Supp. 2d 332 (D.D.C. 2011) (BitTorrent joinder and expedited discovery standards)
  • United States v. Real Property, 135 F.3d 1312 (9th Cir. 1998) (authority on magistrate jurisdiction and non-parties)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hard Drive Productions, Inc. v. DOES 1-188
Court Name: District Court, N.D. California
Date Published: Aug 23, 2011
Citation: 809 F. Supp. 2d 1150
Docket Number: Case C-11-01566 JCS
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Cal.