21-12508
11th Cir.Aug 17, 2022Background
- Hancock County Land Acquisitions claimed a roughly $180 million charitable deduction for a 2016 conservation-easement donation on its Mississippi property.
- The IRS opened an examination in 2018; after extensions discussions, the IRS issued a Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment (FPAA) on July 23, 2020, finding the deduction improper.
- Hancock filed suit two days later alleging an APA claim that I.R.C. § 7803(e)(4) required the IRS to provide Appeals Office review before issuing the FPAA and sought injunctive and declaratory relief (including to block assessment until Appeals review).
- The district court dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, concluding the Anti-Injunction Act (AIA) and the tax exception to the Declaratory Judgment Act (DJA) barred Hancock’s requested relief.
- Hancock appealed to the Eleventh Circuit, which reviewed the jurisdictional dismissal de novo and affirmed the district court.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the AIA bars the suit | Suit challenges unlawful IRS procedure, not a tax assessment; CIC Services controls | Allowing relief would restrain assessment/collection because an FPAA enables immediate assessment | AIA applies; suit seeks to restrain tax assessment and is barred |
| Whether the Williams Packing (Enochs) exception to the AIA applies | Immediate assessment causes irreparable harm; IRS cannot ultimately prevail | Adequate legal remedy exists (Tax Court); IRS could plausibly prevail on merits | Exception does not apply; Hancock has tax-court remedy and merits are debatable |
| Whether declaratory relief is barred by the DJA tax exception | Declaratory relief about statutory obligations should be allowed | Tax exception is coextensive with the AIA and bars such relief | DJA tax exception bars Hancock’s requested declaratory relief |
Key Cases Cited
- CIC Servs., LLC v. Internal Revenue Serv., 141 S. Ct. 1582 (2021) (clarifying when AIA bars suits challenging regulatory duties vs. suits that would restrain tax assessment)
- Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co., 370 U.S. 1 (1962) (establishing narrow AIA injunction exception requiring irreparable harm and certainty IRS cannot prevail)
- Alexander v. Americans United Inc., 416 U.S. 752 (1974) (holding the DJA tax exception is coextensive with the AIA)
- In re Walter Energy, Inc., 911 F.3d 1121 (11th Cir. 2018) (AIA deprives federal courts of jurisdiction when it applies)
- Bob Jones Univ. v. Simon, 416 U.S. 725 (1974) (debate on merits can foreclose application of the Williams Packing exception)
