Hammann v. 1-800 Ideas Inc, 2:08-cv-00886

Hammann sues 800 Ideas, Inc. alleging violations of the Communications Act and related regulations tied to toll-free numbers hoarding and related practices.
Plaintiff previously pursued a Minnesota action involving 1-800 Ideas entities and individuals; sanctions and personal-jurisdiction issues arose there.
In Nevada case, Hammann seeks discovery, including location for service on Susan Parker and financial records allegedly showing control/affiliates.
Discovery closed; movant moves to compel responses to Interrogatories 11, 24, 38, and 40 with varying requested disclosures.
Court considers relevance, burdensomeness, and whether defendants sufficiently supplemented or could be compelled to supplement responses.

Issue	Plaintiff's Argument	Defendant's Argument	Held
Whether Parker's residential address must be disclosed	Hammann argues for Parker's address to depose her.	800 Ideas, Inc. objects; address is not necessary since discovery closed.	Denied; address not required given closed discovery and alternative deposition options.
Whether financial records identifying banks are discoverable	Records show control of the 800 number and ongoing influence after sale.	Records are not relevant or proportional; company not operating since 1997.	Denied; lack of demonstrated relevance and ongoing operation.
Whether Interrogatory 38 requires further action	Parker's information should be fully captured; no further action needed.	Defendant already answered; no additional relief needed.	Withdrawn/No further relief necessary.
Whether 800 Ideas must supplement responses to Interrogatory 40 re: monetary funds	Affiliations between 800 Ideas, Parker, and 1-800 Ideas.com are relevant to claims.	Interrogatory partly answered; Parker-specific funds remain incomplete.	Granted in part; supplement required to identify funds provided by Parker to 1-800 Ideas.com, Inc. from June 5, 2003 to present.

Hammann v. 1-800 Ideas.Com, Inc., et al., 455 F. Supp. 2d 942 (D. Minn. 2006) (district court decision referenced for sanctions and personal jurisdiction context)