midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
97 So. 3d 728
Ala.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Hamilton was pregnant with her second child and received prenatal care from IMG; she was told she was exposed to fifth disease and to schedule ultrasounds.
  • Multiple visits between January and March 2005 revealed concern for potential fetal anemia and possible referral to a perinatologist, which did not occur.
  • On March 10, 2005 an IMG ultrasound showed the fetus had died recently; the fetus was not viable at birth.
  • The DeKalb Circuit Court granted summary judgment: wrongful-death claim for a previable fetus was not allowed and emotional-distress damages were not recoverable.
  • Hamilton appealed the summary judgment; Mack v. Carmack (2011) later held that the Wrongful Death Act permits a claim for the death of a previable fetus, contradicting prior Alabama precedent.
  • Court applies Mack to reverse in part and remand for reconsideration, but affirms the emotional-distress ruling for lack of evidence under zone-of-danger law.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Mack applies to allow wrongful-death recovery for a previable fetus Hamilton argues Mack controls and overrules Gentry/Lollar Defendants say Mack was not yet final; should not apply Yes; Mack applies and reverses the prior grant of summary judgment on wrongful-death claim
Whether Hamilton may recover emotional distress damages Hamilton contends Taylor allows bystander/emotional-distress recovery Defendants rely on zone-of-danger; no physical injury shown No; zone-of-danger requirement and lack of physical injury foreclose claim

Key Cases Cited

  • Mack v. Carmack, 79 So.3d 597 (Ala.2011) (overruled Gentry/Lollar; wrongful death for previable fetus allowed)
  • Gentry v. Gilmore, 613 So.2d 1241 (Ala.1993) (barred wrongful-death recovery for nonviable fetus (pre-Mack))
  • Lollar v. Tankersley, 613 So.2d 1249 (Ala.1993) (precedent denying recovery for previable fetus (pre-Mack))
  • AALAR, Ltd., Inc. v. Francis, 716 So.2d 1141 (Ala.1998) (zone-of-danger framework for emotional distress in Alabama)
  • Taylor v. Baptist Medical Center, Inc., 400 So.2d 369 (Ala.1981) (emotional-distress recovery for failure to attend labor/delivery (historical context))
  • Wolfe v. Isbell, 291 Ala. 327, 280 So.2d 758 (Ala.1973) (fetus not a part of the mother; independent existence within mother)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hamilton v. Scott
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: May 18, 2012
Citations: 97 So. 3d 728; 2012 Ala. LEXIS 66; 2012 WL 1760204; 1100192
Docket Number: 1100192
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
Log In