midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2013 Ohio 3717
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Hambuechen alleged Napoli’s fired her for pregnancy in 2007, triggering an Ohio Civil Rights Commission action.
  • The Commission found a violation on November 15, 2012, after a trial before an ALJ.
  • Napoli’s filed a petition for judicial review under R.C. 4112.06 on November 26, 2012.
  • Service of the petition was made by regular mail, not through the clerk of courts.
  • The trial court dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, holding service had to be through the clerk within 30 days.
  • The issue on appeal is whether service must follow Civ.R. 3 and 4 (one year) or adhere to the 30‑day statutory deadline.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether service must be through the clerk within 30 days under R.C. 4112.06(H). Napoli’s argues Civ.R. 3 and 4 apply, giving one year for service. Napoli’s must be served through the clerk within 30 days under 4112.06(H). Civil Rules apply; not limited to 30 days.

Key Cases Cited

  • City of Cleveland v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm’n, 43 Ohio App.3d 153 (1988) (Civil Rules apply to service absent a clear statutory exception)
  • Donn, Inc. v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm’n, 68 Ohio App.3d 561 (1991) (R.C. 4112.06 requires service through clerk; Civ.R. 3 and 4 apply)
  • Ramsdell v. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm’n, 56 Ohio St.3d 24 (1990) (addressed binding effect of Civ.R. 6(E) on filing deadlines)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hambuechen v. 221 Market N., Inc.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 26, 2013
Citations: 2013 Ohio 3717; 2013CA00044
Docket Number: 2013CA00044
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In