Hall v. State
320 Ga. App. 48
Ga. Ct. App.2013Background
- Hall offered two girls under sixteen money for sex; he engaged in intercourse and oral sex with one girl in the presence of the other.
- The state presented no medical or expert medical testimony at trial.
- Hall argued the state opened the door to evidence of the victim's prior sexual involvement with another man.
- The trial court ruled the prior-acts evidence irrelevant and inadmissible to prove the victim's character or sexual propensity.
- The court discussed medical testimony and child abuse accommodation syndrome as potential bases for admitting otherwise inadmissible evidence.
- This court affirmed Hall’s convictions, holding the exclusion of the challenged prior-sexual-history evidence was not an abuse of discretion.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Admissibility of prior sexual history | Hall contends the state’s elicited testimony opened the door to prior sexual history. | State contends such evidence is irrelevant absent medical testimony and not admissible to show nonchastity or preoccupation with sex. | Exclusion proper; not relevant without medical testimony |
| Door-opening by victim testimony | Hall argues statements about embarrassment and counseling imply prior abuse by another man. | State maintains no medical testimony or abuse syndrome linkage was established. | No error; testimony did not establish medical grounds for admissibility |
| Medical testimony standard | Hall claims the testimony amounted to medical testimony requiring other-acts evidence. | State did not present medical testimony and the court properly excluded related evidence. | No medical testimony requirement; exclusion was proper |
| Citing child abuse accommodation syndrome | Hall relies on accommodation-syndrome reasoning to admit alternative causes. | No syndrome evidence was presented here to connect symptoms to abuse by someone else. | Distinguishable; no basis to admit other-acts evidence |
Key Cases Cited
- Hall v. State, 282 Ga. 294 (2007) (relevance and medical testimony considerations in child molestation cases)
- Keri v. State, 179 Ga. App. 664 (1986) (child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome categories)
- Blackwell v. State, 196 Ga. App. 523 (1990s) (distinguishes when prior sexual acts are admissible absent medical evidence)
- Segura v. State, 280 Ga. App. 685 (2006) (factors for admitting evidence related to abuse findings)
- Holmes v. State, 275 Ga. 853 (2002) (psychiatric considerations in admissibility)
- Burris v. State, 204 Ga. App. 806 (1992) (prior acts and admissibility considerations in abuse cases)
