History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hall v. Goodwill Industries of Southern California
123 Cal. Rptr. 3d 274
Cal. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Hall filed a FEHA retaliation and wrongful termination claim with the DFEH on December 2, 2004.
  • The DFEH issued a right-to-sue notice on December 24, 2004; Boyce received it December 31, 2004.
  • Hall filed his civil complaint against Goodwill on December 30, 2005, more than one year after the notice.
  • Section 12965(b) provides a one-year limitations period commencing from the date of the right-to-sue notice.
  • The trial court and appellate court rejected equitable tolling based on newly discovered evidence; the complaint was untimely.
  • Hall challenged the denial of his motion for a new trial based on asserted newly discovered evidence, which the court rejected.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
When does the one-year FEHA limit begin? Hall contends it begins on receipt of the notice. Goodwill argues it begins on the date of the right-to-sue notice. The one-year period begins from the date of the right-to-sue notice.
Was equitable tolling due to newly discovered evidence warranted? Hall asserts newly discovered evidence tolls the period. Goodwill argues no tolling applies. No tolling; newly discovered evidence failed to establish tolling.
Did the trial court abuse its discretion denying a new trial based on newly discovered evidence? Hall asserts the evidence was newly discovered and material. Goodwill contends it was not newly discovered and not material. No abuse of discretion; evidence not newly discovered.

Key Cases Cited

  • Romano v. Rockwell Internal, Inc., 14 Cal.4th 479 (1996) (FEHA liberal interpretation to promote merits)
  • McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College Dist., 45 Cal.4th 88 (2008) (exhaustion of administrative remedies and right-to-sue notice)
  • California Fed. Savings & Loan Assn. v. City of Los Angeles, 11 Cal.4th 342 (1995) (plain meaning governs statutory interpretation; notice language)
  • Whaley v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., 121 Cal.App.4th 479 (2004) (plain meaning of 'from the date of the notice' interpreted)
  • Ennabe v. Manosa, 190 Cal.App.4th 707 (2010) (liberal statutory construction; tolling considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hall v. Goodwill Industries of Southern California
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Mar 16, 2011
Citation: 123 Cal. Rptr. 3d 274
Docket Number: No. B215860
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.