Hales v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
14-552
| Fed. Cl. | Apr 13, 2017Background
- Petitioner Stephen B. Hales alleged the influenza vaccine caused polymyalgia rheumatica and received compensation pursuant to a stipulation resolving the merits.
- After the merits decision, Hales sought attorneys’ fees and costs totaling $59,279.32 ($24,065.00 in fees; $35,214.32 in costs), including counsel fees for Douglas Lee Burdette and work by an expert, Dr. Zizic.
- The Secretary conceded the statutory entitlement to fees but argued a reasonable total range was $45,000–$55,000, citing comparable Vaccine Program decisions and recommending the special master exercise discretion within that range.
- The special master applied the lodestar method (hours × hourly rates), accepting the requested attorney rates ($350 for Burdette, $250 for Kelly Burdette) and found the billed hours reasonable; counsel had eliminated some entries showing billing judgment.
- The special master found the expert invoices detailed and well-documented (Dr. Zizic: $400/hr, 80.9 hours) and awarded expert costs in full after assessing qualifications and thoroughness of work.
- Considering the Secretary’s proposed range and that counsel could have negotiated, the special master nonetheless awarded the full requested sum of $59,279.32 and ordered payment to petitioner and petitioner’s attorney.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entitlement to fees after successful claim | Hales is entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs under the Vaccine Act | Secretary conceded statutory entitlement | Award granted under 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(e) |
| Appropriate hourly rates for counsel | Requested rates ($350 and $250) are reasonable and supported by prior Vaccine Program decisions and McCulloch matrix | Did not directly challenge rates | Rates accepted as reasonable |
| Reasonableness of hours billed | Hours billed (55.65 by Burdette; 18.35 by K. Burdette) are reasonable; counsel excluded some entries | Did not specifically challenge hours | Hours found reasonable; no reductions made |
| Expert fees and hours | Dr. Zizic’s $400/hr and 80.9 hours are justified by detailed time logs, thorough reports, and his qualifications | Secretary suggested overall range for total fees but did not challenge expert specifics | Expert fees and hours awarded in full |
Key Cases Cited
- Avera v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 515 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (approves lodestar approach and two-step fee determination under the Vaccine Act)
- Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886 (1984) (establishes the lodestar formula: reasonable hours multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate)
- Saxton v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 3 F.3d 1517 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (hours claimed must not be excessive, redundant, or unnecessary)
