History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hale v. Smiley
3:25-cv-00067
| N.D. Ind. | Apr 25, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Alex L. Hale, an inmate, filed an amended pro se complaint seeking damages against three prison officials: Rekitzke, Burkett, and Grievance Specialist Smith.
  • Hale alleges he was raped by another inmate and his subsequent PREA (Prison Rape Elimination Act) complaint was mishandled by the named defendants.
  • He claims improper investigation and failure to move him away from the alleged perpetrator, placing him at ongoing risk of harm and violating his constitutional rights.
  • Hale also asserts his inmate grievance regarding the PREA complaint was improperly processed, further endangering him.
  • The court screened the amended complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for legal sufficiency and previously dismissed similar claims in an earlier screening order.
  • Hale filed a motion for relief with requests beyond the scope of his amended complaint.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Failure to properly investigate PREA complaint Investigation not properly conducted No constitutional right to investigation Dismissed—no constitutional right to force investigation
Mishandling of inmate grievance process Grievance not handled as PREA complaint No right to grievance process Dismissed—no constitutional right to grievance process
Failure to follow prison policy/procedure Prison policies were not followed § 1983 protects constitutional rights only Dismissed—no claim for breach of policies alone
Failure to protect from risk of harm Not moved away from alleged perpetrator No actual harm after filing PREA report Dismissed—no failure to protect where no new attack

Key Cases Cited

  • Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89 (liberally construing pro se complaints)
  • Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614 (no private right to demand prosecution)
  • Scott v. Edinburg, 346 F.3d 752 (Section 1983 does not protect against violation of state policies)
  • Grieveson v. Anderson, 538 F.3d 763 (no substantive due process right to grievance procedure)
  • Haley v. Gross, 86 F.3d 630 (deliberate indifference standard for inmate-on-inmate violence)
  • Doe v. Welborn, 110 F.3d 520 (mere exposure to risk does not state Eighth Amendment claim)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hale v. Smiley
Court Name: District Court, N.D. Indiana
Date Published: Apr 25, 2025
Docket Number: 3:25-cv-00067
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Ind.