History
  • No items yet
midpage
36 Misc. 3d 497
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Policy issued Feb 25, 2005 for $5 million; Leo G. Family Trust as owner and beneficiary; Leo G. Family Trust trustee Aharon Rochman; insured Leo Goodstein; trust changed beneficiary Oct 2008 to MN Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust.
  • Leo Goodstein died Mar 18, 2009; MN Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust filed claim with US Life Insurance Co.
  • US Life investigated and alleged an imposter signed the application; purported blood/urine samples may have come from different individuals.
  • Policy contains incontestability clause: policy incontestable after two years from issue, subject to exceptions for fraud/misrepresentation.
  • Plaintiff seeks summary judgment asserting no evidence of fraud and that incontestability statute bars post-two-year challenges; defendant contends policy void ab initio for fraud and lack of insurable interest.
  • Court grants summary judgment for plaintiff, holding the trust is not a stranger to the policy and incontestability bars contest beyond two years; insurable interest issues are weighed against incontestability policy and legislature.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the incontestability clause bars post-two-year challenges. MN Irrevocable Life argues statute precludes post-two-year contesting. US Life contends fraud/impersonation justifies voiding or contesting the policy. Yes; contest barred after two years absent a supported exception.
Whether the trust’s ownership/beneficiary status makes it a stranger to the contract. Trust was purchaser/owner/beneficiary; not a stranger; entitled to policy benefits. If not benign, imposter issue could render contract void. Trust not a stranger; entitled to benefits and incontestability applies.
Whether lack of insurable interest voids the policy or is still contestable within two years. Lack of insurable interest does not void under incontestability; contestable window governs. Lack of consent/insurable interest could be grounds to challenge. Insurable interest issue does not void the contract beyond two years under current doctrine.

Key Cases Cited

  • New England Mut. Life Ins. Co. v Caruso, 73 N.Y.2d 74 (N.Y. 1989) (insurable interest and incontestability interplay; not void ab initio but contestable within two-year window)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Halberstam v. United States Life Insurance
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: May 9, 2012
Citations: 36 Misc. 3d 497; 945 N.Y.S.2d 513
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
Log In
    Halberstam v. United States Life Insurance, 36 Misc. 3d 497