History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hagerman v. State
264 P.3d 18
Wyo.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Hagerman challenged two consolidated sentences: burglary (S-11-0154) and stolen property (S-11-0155).
  • He was sentenced October 3, 2006 for burglary after 350 days’ presentence jail time, with one year jail and four years probation split sentencing.
  • He received 350 days jail credit against the burglary sentence and 8 days post-sentencing jail time.
  • He later received 336 days credit against the stolen property sentence, with concurrent sentencing terms later ordered.
  • He spent 301 days in a residential treatment facility as part of the burglary sentence, and the district court treated time in treatment in determining credits.
  • The court held that 659 days of presentence confinement should be credited against the burglary sentence, and the 33 days of pre-revocation jail time could be credited against either sentence, but not both.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is presentence confinement properly credited to the burglary sentence? Hagerman argues for proper credit against burglary. State argues current credits were properly calculated. Burglary sentence lacked proper credit; remand for correction.
Can time spent in pre-revocation jail be credited to the stolen property sentence? Credit should be against underlying burglary sentence, not both. Credit may be allocated to either sentence. Credit must be applied to the underlying burglary time, not the stolen property sentence.
Does over-crediting one sentence affect legality of the other? Over-crediting does not render the other sentence illegal if still valid. Remand for S-11-0154; S-11-0155 affirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Swain v. State, 2009 WY 142 (Wy. 2009) (illegal sentence when proper credit is missing; de novo review of credit issues)
  • Abitbol v. State, 2008 WY 28 (Wy. 2008) (presentence confinement credit when due to inability to post bond)
  • Merta v. State, 2007 WY 137 (Wy. 2007) (credit for presentence confinement; time against underlying sentence)
  • Jackson v. State, 2009 WY 82 (Wy. 2009) (credit against underlying sentence when revocation occurs; pre-revocation time attributed to underlying charge)
  • Beyer v. State, 2008 WY 137 (Wy. 2008) (credit for time in inpatient treatment if detention count applies)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hagerman v. State
Court Name: Wyoming Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 7, 2011
Citation: 264 P.3d 18
Docket Number: S-11-0154, S-11-0155
Court Abbreviation: Wyo.