History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hadassah v. Schwartz
2012 Ohio 3910
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Hadassah filed a complaint in trial court alleging Schwartz fraudulently administered an estate and inter vivos trusts to Hadassah’s detriment; counts 1-6 target Schwartz in various capacities, count 7 alleges civil conspiracy.
  • Probate court and trial court addresses jurisdiction; some counts were transferred to probate court; remaining claims stayed for judicial economy.
  • Trial court lifted the stay as to counts 4-6; Schwartz failed to appear at a properly noticed deposition; court sanctioned him under Civ.R. 37(B)(2)(c) and entered default judgment on counts 4-6 and 7.
  • Schwartz moved under Civ.R. 60(B) to vacate the default judgment; trial court denied the motion and Schwartz appealed.
  • Appellate court held there was no final, appealable order due to lack of Civ.R. 54(B) language; unresolved claims and concurrent jurisdiction rendered the entry nonfinal; the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is the Civ.R.60(B) appealable from a nonfinal order? Hadassah Schwartz No final, appealable order; Civ.R.60(B) appeal dismissed
Was the default judgment final under Civ.R.54(B)? Hadassah Schwartz No Civ.R.54(B) language; not final; entry nullity for appeal purposes
Does remaining pending/concurrent-jurisdiction litigation affect finality? Hadassah Schwartz Yes; unresolved claims and concurrent jurisdiction prevent finality

Key Cases Cited

  • Jarrett v. Dayton Osteopathic Hosp., Inc., 20 Ohio St.3d 77, 486 N.E.2d 99 (1985) (finality requires Civ.R.54(B) language for partial judgments)
  • Colley v. Bazell, 64 Ohio St.2d 243, 416 N.E.2d 605 (1980) (Civ.R.60(B) relief from final judgment; finality rules)
  • Phoenix Office & Supply Co. v. Little Forest Nursing Ctr., 7th Dist. No. 99 CA 15 (2000) (motion to vacate cannot create final judgment where none exists)
  • Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ., 44 Ohio St.3d 86, 547 N.E.2d 64 (1989) (final order requirements; finality principles)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hadassah v. Schwartz
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 29, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 3910
Docket Number: C-110699
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.