Gwendolyn Hagerman v. State of Tennessee
E2016-01555-CCA-R3-PC
| Tenn. Crim. App. | May 9, 2017Background
- Gwendolyn Hagerman was convicted of five counts of rape of a child after a jury trial; she received an effective sixty-year sentence following resentencing.
- The State originally made a written plea offer (February 16, 2010) of 15 years, all counts concurrent; at trial the State revoked offers after plea negotiations and a counter-offer by defense counsel.
- Hagerman filed a pro se petition for post-conviction relief claiming, inter alia, ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to timely convey plea offers; she later waived all claims except the plea-notification claim.
- At the post-conviction hearing, Hagerman and her mother testified that Hagerman was not given the 15-year offer and that counsel behaved dismissively on the morning of trial.
- Trial counsel and the prosecutor testified that the 15-year written offer was provided to counsel and discussed with Hagerman before trial; counsel made a 20-year counter-offer the morning of trial and the State revoked outstanding offers.
- The post-conviction court credited trial counsel and the prosecutor over Hagerman, found Hagerman failed to prove deficient performance or prejudice, and denied relief; the appellate court affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether counsel was ineffective for failing to timely convey plea offers | Hagerman: counsel did not give her the February 16, 2010 written 15-year offer and did not adequately advise her; she would have accepted the plea | State & counsel: written 15-year offer was provided to defense counsel, discussed with Hagerman pretrial; the morning counter-offer failed and offers were revoked | Court: Credited State and counsel; Hagerman failed to prove deficient performance or prejudice; claim denied |
Key Cases Cited
- Baxter v. Rose, 523 S.W.2d 930 (Tenn. 1975) (standard for effective assistance of counsel under Tennessee law)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984) (two-prong test for ineffective assistance: deficiency and prejudice)
- Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 133 (U.S. 2012) (duty to communicate formal plea offers)
- Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (U.S. 1985) (standard for prejudice in plea context)
- Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156 (U.S. 2012) (plea negotiation errors can warrant relief)
- Nesbit v. State, 452 S.W.3d 779 (Tenn. 2014) (plea-offer communication and prejudice analysis in Tennessee)
- Burns v. State, 6 S.W.3d 453 (Tenn. 1999) (deference to tactical decisions of counsel and Strickland application)
- Momon v. State, 18 S.W.3d 152 (Tenn. 1999) (post-conviction factfinding and credibility deference)
