Gustavia Home, LLC v. Hickson
1:16-cv-03098
E.D.N.YAug 21, 2017Background
- Gustavia Home obtained a default judgment of foreclosure against property owned by Cassandra Hickson; judgment entered March 21, 2017.
- 56 Somers St. LLC (a New York LLC asserting interest) moved repeatedly to stay the foreclosure and to vacate the default judgment; court denied interim stays in May 2017 after addressing anticipated vacatur arguments on the record.
- Service: Gustavia served the summons/complaint and subsequent notices on the New York Secretary of State as agent for 56 Somers; affidavits of service were filed.
- 56 Somers later filed for bankruptcy the day before a scheduled foreclosure sale; bankruptcy court dismissed the petition for not being filed in good faith.
- 56 Somers renewed a motion to vacate the default judgment (July 3, 2017) raising (a) improper service under 28 U.S.C. § 1655, (b) alleged statute-of-limitations/acceleration defenses, and (c) other previously rejected or unasserted defenses.
- District court denied the motion to vacate, finding service proper, no meritorious defense shown, willful default, and prejudice to Gustavia from delay.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Validity of service of process | Service on Secretary of State and by mail satisfied federal and NY law | Service improper under 28 U.S.C. § 1655 and LLC did not receive proper notice | Service was valid under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(A)/4(e) and N.Y. LLC law; § 1655 inapplicable |
| Vacatur of default judgment for excusable neglect | Default justified; vacatur would prejudice plaintiff and delay relief | Default should be vacated based on lack of notice or other defenses | Vacatur denied: 56 Somers willfully failed to defend; no adequate showing of meritorious defense and vacatur would prejudice Gustavia |
| Effect of bankruptcy filing/stay | Bankruptcy filing stayed proceedings and justified relief | Filing was in bad faith and timed to delay foreclosure | Bankruptcy petition dismissed as not filed in good faith; stay did not excuse prior defaults |
| Statute-of-limitations / acceleration defense | Prior acceleration (2007) by original mortgagee may bar foreclosure | Gustavia’s pleadings and evidence do not show earlier acceleration; creditor’s 2016 letter does not prove 2007 acceleration | Defense rejected: Itah declaration and collection letter do not prove acceleration in 2007 and do not defeat foreclosure claim |
Key Cases Cited
- H. F. Livermore Corp. v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder Loepfe, 432 F.2d 689 (D.C. Cir. 1970) (holding undue delay in seeking relief can prejudice the opposing party and justify denial of relief)
