midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
61 So. 3d 731
La. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Gullatt sued Allstate to collect under UM coverage arguing the waiver form was invalid.
  • Allstate denied Gullatt had UM coverage and Gullatt moved for summary judgment asserting the UM waiver was invalid.
  • The trial court denied Gullatt's summary judgment and designated the judgment final for appeal.
  • Louisiana law on appeal from summary judgment and certification of partial final judgments was discussed; the court converted the appeal to a writ and conducted de novo review.
  • Duncan v. U.S.A.A. Insurance Co. held UM form validity requires the insured to date the form and perform six prescribed tasks.
  • The parties presented conflicting affidavits about who dated the form; the trial court found a genuine issue of material fact as to when/by whom the form was dated, denying summary judgment.
  • On appeal, Gullatt contends the form was not dated by her, while Allstate asserts the form was dated by the insurer's agent; the court ultimately denied relief, finding a genuine issue of material fact.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
UM rejection form validity hinges on insured-dating per Duncan Gullatt did not date the form; thus waiver invalid Duncan requires six tasks; form validity can be proven by others; date may be established Genuine issue of material fact exists; summary judgment denied
Procedural posture of appeal converted to writ application Conversion preserves plaintiff's rights and review Court acted to promote economy; writ review appropriate Court converted appeal to writ and conducted de novo review

Key Cases Cited

  • Rubin v. Westport Ins. Corp., 833 So.2d 1245 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2002) (review of denial of summary judgment; non-appealable judgment)
  • Cole v. Cole, 971 So.2d 1185 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2007) (discretion to convert appeal to supervisory writs)
  • Duncan v. U.S.A.A. Insurance Co., 950 So.2d 544 (La. 2006) (UM form must be dated and contain six prescribed tasks)
  • Hines v. Garrett, 876 So.2d 764 (La. 2004) (summary judgment standard and genuine issue of material fact)
  • Garsee v. Botoie, 852 So.2d 1156 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2003) (definition of material fact and appellate review)
  • McCord v. West, 983 So.2d 133 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2008) (reference on summary judgment standard)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Gullatt v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Feb 15, 2011
Citations: 61 So. 3d 731; 10 La.App. 5 Cir. 448; 2011 La. App. LEXIS 214; 2011 WL 523381; No. 10-CA-448
Docket Number: No. 10-CA-448
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In