History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gugino v. City of Buffalo
1:21-cv-00283
W.D.N.Y.
May 1, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Martin Gugino sued the City of Buffalo and various officials alleging excessive force during a protest, resulting in serious injury.
  • During discovery, the plaintiff deposed John Evans, President of the Buffalo Police Benevolent Association, as a non-party witness.
  • During the deposition, Evans’s attorney, Rodney Personius, improperly provided Evans with notes instructing him on how to respond to questions, leading to suspension of the deposition.
  • Plaintiff Gougino moved for sanctions against Personius and to compel Evans’s continued deposition.
  • The court previously determined Personius alone was responsible for the deposition’s termination and granted attorney fees to Gugino’s counsel for additional work incurred.
  • This opinion concerns the amount of attorney fees and costs Gugino is entitled to recover as sanctions for Personius’s conduct.

Issues

Issue Gugino's Argument Personius's Argument Held
Are sanctions for terminating the deposition appropriate? Personius’s conduct was obstructive, justifying sanctions. Sanctions not required; not subject to guidelines as non-party counsel. Sanctions appropriate under Rule 30(d)(2); guidelines apply.
Scope of recoverable attorney fees All fees and costs related to the aborted deposition and subsequent motions should be recoverable. Only fees for motion to compel, not for prep or multiple attorneys. Only fees for work after deposition was terminated; only one attorney’s hours allowed.
Reasonableness of the hourly rate $275/hour reasonable for similar civil rights litigators in the district. No objection. $275/hour approved as reasonable.
Recoverability of deposition-related costs Costs for video and transcript should be reimbursed. No objection. $916.40 in costs granted.

Key Cases Cited

  • Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 (lodestar method is the typical starting point for attorney fee awards in civil rights litigation)
  • Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886 (reasonable hourly rate defined by prevailing market rates)
  • McDonald v. Pension Plan of the NYSA–ILA Pension Trust Fund, 450 F.3d 91 (court may reduce hours claimed in fee application to eliminate excessive or redundant hours)
  • Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 885 F.2d 1053 (application of prevailing rates for similar services)

Conclusion: Plaintiff is awarded $6,105 in attorney fees and $916.40 in costs, payable by Personius, for a total of $7,021.40.

Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Gugino v. City of Buffalo
Court Name: District Court, W.D. New York
Date Published: May 1, 2025
Citation: 1:21-cv-00283
Docket Number: 1:21-cv-00283
Court Abbreviation: W.D.N.Y.