History
  • No items yet
midpage
Guardian Ad Litem and Department of Children and Families v. L.W., Mother of A.S., a Child and V.S., Father of A.S., a Child
5D2024-3420
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Mar 14, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • The Guardian ad Litem and Department of Children and Families (DCF) appealed a trial court order denying their shelter petition and returning child A.S. to his mother, L.W.
  • At the time of A.S.'s birth in September 2023, L.W. had an open dependency case since 2019 involving four other children, placed in out-of-home foster care, with only supervised visits allowed.
  • L.W. had not achieved substantial compliance with her case plan for her other children; the goal in that case was adoption, not reunification.
  • Initially, A.S.'s father, V.S., agreed to care for A.S. given L.W.'s constraints. However, after V.S. was arrested, A.S. was left exclusively in L.W.'s care in violation of the required supervision.
  • DCF subsequently filed a petition to shelter A.S., citing L.W.'s unresolved child protection history and current inability to provide safe care.
  • The trial court found DCF did not establish probable cause to shelter A.S. and ordered the child returned to L.W.; this decision was appealed by DCF and the Guardian ad Litem.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did DCF establish probable cause to shelter A.S.? Statutory criteria for sheltering met due to L.W.'s open, unresolved dependency case and lack of substantial compliance. DCF failed to prove probable cause; A.S. should remain with the mother. Yes; DCF established probable cause as a matter of law.
Does an open dependency case with lack of substantial compliance constitute probable cause under Fla. Stat. § 39.01(2)? The statute's plain language makes such circumstances sufficient for probable cause. Opposed statutory reading; argued trial court had discretion to deny shelter. Statutory language is clear; such facts require finding of probable cause.

Key Cases Cited

  • Dep’t of Child. & Fams. v. D.H.C., 360 So. 3d 454 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023) (explained the probable cause standard in the shelter context and its application to open dependency cases)
  • Alachua County v. Watson, 333 So. 3d 162 (Fla. 2022) (emphasized the primacy of statutory text in judicial interpretation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Guardian Ad Litem and Department of Children and Families v. L.W., Mother of A.S., a Child and V.S., Father of A.S., a Child
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 14, 2025
Docket Number: 5D2024-3420
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.