GRESHAM v. HARRIS Et Al.
329 Ga. App. 465
Ga. Ct. App.2014Background
- Gresham sued Harris defendants for assault, conspiracy, negligence, and punitive damages relating to events in 2010.
- He voluntarily dismissed the suit as to all but one defendant on July 11, 2012; dismissal order entered August 12, 2012.
- Final judgment was entered October 23, 2012 as to the remaining defendant.
- Gresham filed a renewal action on February 11, 2013, asserting substantially the same claims.
- The trial court granted summary judgment to Harris based on expiration of the statute of limitations.
- The Court of Appeals reversed, holding the renewal period began August 13, 2012, making February 11, 2013 timely.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| When does the six-month renewal period begin under OCGA § 9-2-61(a)? | Gresham—begins August 12, 2012 (dismissal entry) | Harris—begins July 11, 2012 (filing of partial dismissal) | Six-month period begins after dismissal entry: August 13, 2012. |
Key Cases Cited
- Clark v. Newsome, 180 Ga. 97 (1935) (renewal right hinges on termination of the prior action; six months from termination)
- Rountree v. Key, 71 Ga. 214 (1883) (discontinuance may result from want of prosecution, but renewal period starts at termination)
- Kilgore v. Stewart, 307 Ga. App. 374 (2010) (renewal period begins when dismissal is effective if dismissing all parties)
- Carter v. Digby, 244 Ga. App. 217 (2000) (voluntary dismissal requires court order; timing tied to dismissal filing)
- Swartzel v. Garner, 193 Ga. App. 267 (1989) (reiterates timing tied to filing of dismissal/termination)
- Parsons v. Capital Alliance Financial, LLC, 325 Ga. App. 884 (2014) (remedial renewal act construed liberally; six-month window tied to termination)
- Morris v. Haren, 52 F.3d 947 (1995) (Eleventh Circuit: discontinuance vs dismissal distinct; timing from intention to dismiss)
