Gresham-Green v. Mainones
290 Ga. 721
| Ga. | 2012Background
- Gresham-Green and Mainones married in 2006 and divorced by Final Decree on May 13, 2011.
- Trial court awarded primary custody to Husband and Wife was ordered to pay child support.
- Wife appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court under Rule 34(4).
- Guardian ad litem testified at the final hearing; the GAL report itself was not admitted into evidence.
- Trial court’s order did not reference the GAL report and no record shows reliance on it; error claimed for non-admission deemed harmless.
- Temporary order deviated from presumptive child support, allocating 80% of costs to Husband due to Wife’s custody; mortgage at issue; final order used worksheets for income; incomes accepted as true.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| GAL report admissibility affecting custody | Gresham-Green argues trial court erred by relying on a non-admitted GAL report. | Mainones contends GAL testified and no reliance on the report occurred. | Harmless error; GAL testified and order did not rely on the report. |
| Temporary support and income consideration | Wife contends no temporary support and income not considered in final order. | Husband argues deviation authorized and incomes were properly used. | No error; deviation permitted; incomes accepted from worksheets. |
| Finding custody and delegation of findings | Wife claims improper delegation to Husband via drafted Final Decree; insufficient findings. | Husband argues drafting by counsel is permissible; forfeiture for not requesting more findings. | Permissible procedure; no failure to make required findings; judgment affirmed. |
Key Cases Cited
- Finklea v. Finklea, 290 Ga. 357 (2012) (forfeiture when no request for additional findings made)
- Gallo v. Kofler, 289 Ga. 355 (2011) (drafting of orders allowed; findings context)
