History
  • No items yet
midpage
144 So. 3d 736
La.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Dr. Tommie M. Granger, a cardiac surgeon with privileges at CHRISTUS St. Frances Cabrini Hospital (Cabrini), was summarily suspended after complications with a December 18, 2002 patient; privileges were reinstated January 10, 2003 but later peer-review activity culminated in a recommendation (and later ratification) that his privileges be revoked unless he submitted to anger-management evaluation.
  • Dr. Granger sued Cabrini asserting breach of contract (hospital bylaws), negligent misrepresentation, LUTPA, defamation, fraud, and sought damages; the trial jury found for Granger on breach of bylaws and negligent misrepresentation and awarded past lost income and general damages.
  • The trial court granted partial summary judgment for Cabrini as to HCQIA immunity for the initial summary suspension; that ruling was reversed by the Third Circuit, which nonetheless reduced damages; Cabrini sought review to the Louisiana Supreme Court.
  • The Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed whether Cabrini was entitled to immunity under HCQIA or Louisiana peer-review statute, whether the bylaws created an enforceable contract, whether negligent misrepresentation liability existed, and the proper scope of damages.
  • The Court found (1) Cabrini failed to satisfy HCQIA procedural requirements (including post-suspension hearing) and the jury’s findings that peer review was motivated by malice and not in furtherance of quality health care were not manifestly erroneous; (2) Louisiana peer-review statutory immunity did not apply; (3) Cabrini’s bylaws and the application/appointment process created a contractual relationship and Cabrini breached by denying required procedural protections; and (4) negligent misrepresentation by hospital officials supported damages.
  • The Court affirmed liability for breach of contract and negligent misrepresentation, but reversed and vacated the award for lost income (holding Dr. Granger voluntarily failed to reapply for reappointment and causation for lost income was unsupported).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Applicability of HCQIA immunity to Cabrini's peer review Granger: HCQIA doesn't shield Cabrini because procedures required by §11112 were not followed and actions were malicious Cabrini: post-suspension proceedings were mere activity, not "professional review action," or met HCQIA standards Held: HCQIA immunity inapplicable—Cabrini failed to provide required post-suspension hearing and jury findings on malice/unreasonable belief stand
Louisiana peer-review statutory immunity (LSA‑R.S. 13:3715.3) Granger: state immunity unavailable because peer review was done with malice and lacked objective reasonableness Cabrini: statute protects peer-review committee actions absent malice and with reasonable belief Held: Immunity unavailable—jury reasonably found malice and lack of reasonable basis
Enforceability of hospital bylaws as contract and breach Granger: Bylaws + application process created binding contract entitling him to procedural protections and damages for breach Cabrini: Bylaws are not a contractual obligation or, if they are, no breach caused damage Held: Bylaws formed part of contractual relationship; Cabrini breached by denying required hearing; breach supports damages (except lost income)
Negligent misrepresentation claim Granger: Cabrini officials made negligent misrepresentations during peer review that he relied on and were harmful Cabrini: No special duty or detrimental reliance; no basis for tort liability Held: Jury reasonably found duty/breach/causation; negligent misrepresentation liability sustained

Key Cases Cited

  • Poliner v. Texas Health Sys., 537 F.3d 368 (5th Cir. 2008) (discusses HCQIA purpose and standards for peer-review immunity)
  • Moore v. Williamsburg Reg'l Hosp., 560 F.3d 166 (4th Cir. 2009) (HCQIA interpretation and limited immunity for properly conducted peer review)
  • Bryan v. James E. Holmes Reg'l Med. Ctr., 33 F.3d 1318 (11th Cir. 1994) (districts of HCQIA immunity and availability of injunctive relief despite no damages remedy under HCQIA)
  • Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., 639 So.2d 730 (La. 1994) (construing Louisiana peer-review statute as qualified immunity and analyzing good faith/malice standard)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Granger v. Christus Health Central Louisiana
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Jun 28, 2013
Citations: 144 So. 3d 736; 2013 WL 3287128; No. 2012-C-1892
Docket Number: No. 2012-C-1892
Court Abbreviation: La.
Log In
    Granger v. Christus Health Central Louisiana, 144 So. 3d 736