History
  • No items yet
midpage
Graham v. State
300 Ga. 620
Ga.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Graham pled guilty to felony murder, armed robbery, and first-degree arson under a negotiated plea.
  • Less than a month later, she moved to withdraw the guilty plea alleging attorney coercion; trial court denied.
  • On appeal, the State bears the burden to show the plea was intelligent and voluntary either on the plea record or extrinsic evidence.
  • At the plea hearing Graham stated she understood rights, faced no coercion, and entered the plea freely and voluntarily.
  • During the withdrawal hearing, Graham claimed coercion by counsel; counsel testified he did not tell her she faced death if she rejected the plea.
  • The trial court weighed credibility and concluded Graham was not credible; the court denied withdrawal, and the conviction was affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the plea was voluntary and properly entered Graham argues coercion invalidated the plea State contends plea was voluntary and informed Plea found voluntary; no manifest abuse in denial of withdrawal
Whether withdrawal of a guilty plea after sentencing is permitted for manifest injustice Graham asserts manifest injustice due to coercion State asserts withdrawal requires manifest injustice or none shown Post-sentencing withdrawal allowed only to correct manifest injustice; no manifest injustice shown
Role of trial court in credibility determinations at withdrawal hearing Graham contends court erred in crediting her testimony over counsel State contends credibility weighing was within trial court's discretion Trial court properly weighed credibility; no abuse of discretion

Key Cases Cited

  • Cazanas v. State, 270 Ga. 130, 508 SE2d 412 (Ga. 1998) (burden on State to show plea was intelligent and voluntary)
  • Loyd v. State, 288 Ga. 481, 705 SE2d 616 (Ga. 2011) (plea voluntary shown by plea record or extrinsic evidence)
  • Maddox v. State, 278 Ga. 823, 607 SE2d 587 (Ga. 2005) (withdrawal before sentencing allowed for any reason; after sentencing for manifest injustice)
  • State v. Evans, 265 Ga. 332, 454 SE2d 468 (Ga. 1995) (manifest injustice includes involuntary plea or lack of understanding)
  • McGuyton v. State, 298 Ga. 351, 782 SE2d 21 (Ga. 2016) (withdrawal ruling is discretionary and reviewed for manifest abuse)
  • Pike v. State, 245 Ga. App. 518, 538 SE2d 172 (Ga. App. 2000) (credibility determinations at withdrawal hearing)
  • Bell v. State, 294 Ga. 5, 749 SE2d 672 (Ga. 2013) (plea advisement rights and voluntary entry principles)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Graham v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 27, 2017
Citation: 300 Ga. 620
Docket Number: S16A1882
Court Abbreviation: Ga.