History
  • No items yet
midpage
Grady Management, Inc. v. Epps
98 A.3d 457
Md. Ct. Spec. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Tenant Jesse Epps occupied a Section 8 New Construction project-based unit with a lease that automatically renewed year-to-year but could be terminated by landlord only for "good cause" or material noncompliance.
  • Landlord Grady Management previously sued Epps under Maryland's breach-of-lease statute; a jury found a substantial breach but concluded it did not warrant eviction.
  • After the term ended, Grady served a Notice to Vacate alleging the same lease violations and filed a tenant holding-over action when Epps refused to leave.
  • Epps moved for summary judgment, asserting the landlord was precluded by res judicata/collateral estoppel from relitigating good-cause termination and that holding-over did not apply to his automatically renewing, project-based lease.
  • The circuit court granted summary judgment for Epps, reasoning the prior jury verdict that the breach did not warrant eviction precluded using that conduct as good cause to refuse renewal; this appeal followed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Grady) Defendant's Argument (Epps) Held
Whether landlord may use Maryland tenant holding-over statute to remove a project-based, automatically renewing Section 8 tenant Holding-over is available after a term ends; Carter permits using holding-over for federally subsidized tenants and should extend to project-based leases Project-based leases with a contractual "good cause" renewal right create an indefinite tenancy; holding-over statute inapplicable until termination for good cause is established Held: Holding-over can apply but not until good cause to terminate (equivalent to eviction standard) is established; here, landlord was precluded from holding-over based on prior verdict
Whether the standard to refuse renewal at end-of-term (other good cause) is less stringent than breach-of-lease eviction standard End-of-term refusal to renew requires lesser proof than mid-term eviction; different remedial statutes apply Refusal-to-renew based on lease violations is essentially an eviction and must meet breach-of-lease (warrants eviction) standard Held: Good cause to refuse renewal based on lease violations is subject to the same R.P. § 8-402.1 eviction standard (not a lesser burden)
Whether the prior jury verdict (substantial breach but not warranting eviction) bars the holding-over action (res judicata / collateral estoppel) Res judicata not applicable because holding-over is a distinct statutory action and could be brought at term end Prior verdict decided same core dispute; same parties and final judgment preclude relitigation of good cause Held: Res judicata / collateral estoppel apply — prior verdict precludes relitigation of the same lease-violation-based good-cause claim, so summary judgment for tenant was proper
Whether tenant holding-over action was premature or notice defective (procedural timing) Landlord served notice and filed holding-over after notice date Epps argued notice date and filing were premature (not decided below) Not decided on appeal (trial court did not base ruling on this point; appellate court declined to address it)

Key Cases Cited

  • Carter v. Maryland Management Co., 377 Md. 596 (Court held tenant-holding-over statute can be used for federally subsidized voucher tenants but landlord must establish good cause to refuse renewal)
  • Cottman v. Princess Anne Villas, 340 Md. 295 (lease with federal protections gives tenant a continuing right of possession for an indefinite period)
  • Carroll v. Housing Opportunities Comm'n, 306 Md. 515 (federal good-cause requirement gives voucher tenants right to remain until good cause is shown)
  • Swann v. Gastonia Housing Authority, 675 F.2d 1342 (federal cases treating end-of-term nonrenewal as requiring good cause similar to eviction)
  • Sager v. Housing Commission of Anne Arundel County, 957 F. Supp. 2d 627 (D. Md. 2013) (project-based subsidized tenant entitled to remain absent a hearing showing serious/repeated violations or other good cause)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Grady Management, Inc. v. Epps
Court Name: Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Date Published: Aug 28, 2014
Citation: 98 A.3d 457
Docket Number: 2037/12
Court Abbreviation: Md. Ct. Spec. App.