History
  • No items yet
midpage
Goodman v. Cleland
2012 Ohio 5044
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Cleland owned the Econowash Laundry Mat in Highland County and Hatfield worked there from 2006 to 2008, earning $2.00 per hour.
  • Hatfield lived on Cleland’s property; Cleland contends Hatfield’s housing was part of her compensation and not a wage issue.
  • Hatfield filed a minimum-wage complaint; the Ohio Commerce Department found wage law violations and determined back wages, damages, and overtime amounts.
  • The Commerce Department filed suit January 26, 2011; Cleland answered denying employer status.
  • The trial court granted summary judgment to the Commerce Department on liability; a bench trial on damages followed in January 2012.
  • The court awarded Hatfield unpaid minimum wage, overtime, and damages; Cleland appealed, raising issues about lodging as wages and not-an-employer status.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether summary judgment on liability was proper Hatfield argues Cleland was an employer and liable for wages. Cleland contends lodging provided to Hatfield would count as wages, creating factual issues. Summary judgment proper; lodging not customary; no wage counting as wages.
Whether Cleland waived not-an-employer defense at trial Hatfield contends Cleland’s status as not an employer should be litigated. Cleland asserts not-an-employer defense; evidence should be admitted. Cleland waived not-an-employer defense by failing to raise it in opposition to summary judgment.

Key Cases Cited

  • Comer v. Risko, 106 Ohio St.3d 185 (2005-Ohio-4559) (standard for summary judgment reviews de novo)
  • Grimes v. Grimes, 2009-Ohio-3126 (4th Dist.) (summary-judgment framework; appellate deference limits)
  • Dresher v. Burt, 75 Ohio St.3d 280 (1996) (burden on movant to show no genuine issue; Civ.R.56)
  • Jones v. Village of Chagrin Falls, 77 Ohio St.3d 456 (1997) (timeliness of raising affirmative defenses; relation to summary judgment)
  • First United Methodist Church v. Doe, 68 Ohio St.3d 531 (1994) (statutory interpretation; wage definition including lodging if customary)
  • State v. Sufronko, 105 Ohio App.3d 504 (1995) (de novo review of statutory interpretation)
  • Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Cleveland, 75 Ohio St.3d 31 (1996) (affirming trial court action under appropriate legal grounds)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Goodman v. Cleland
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 25, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 5044
Docket Number: 12CA04
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.