History
  • No items yet
midpage
214 Cal. App. 4th 472
Cal. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Miller moved to compel complete discovery responses and Good was ordered to provide them by November 15, 2010.
  • Miller sought monetary and terminating sanctions on January 5, 2011 for willful noncompliance.
  • An order granting terminating sanctions was entered on May 11, 2011.
  • Good filed a notice of appeal from the terminating sanctions order on July 11, 2011, mischaracterizing it as an order dismissing Miller.
  • A Miller-side judgment in Miller’s favor was filed on July 26, 2011; Good’s opening brief argued timeliness following Judgment, not the nonappealable order.
  • The appellate court declined to salvage the premature appeal from a nonappealable order and dismissed the appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the premature appeal from a nonappealable order may be salvaged. Good contends timing should be treated as after judgment. Miller argues the order is nonappealable and cannot be salvaged. No salvage; discretionary relief denied.
Whether Good requested the court to salvage the appeal. Good did not ask for relief to salvage the appeal. Miller contends absence of request bars relief. Relief denied for failure to request it.
Whether Good misstated appealability in briefing. Good claimed the appeal was timely after judgment. Miller highlighted the misstatement and nonappealability. Misstatement weighed against relief; appeal dismissed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Cohen v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 196 Cal.App.3d 669 (Cal. App. 1987) (limits on salvaging premature appeals)
  • Nickell v. Matlock, 206 Cal.App.4th 934 (Cal. App. 2012) (nonappealable orders and 8.104 implications)
  • Giannuzzi v. State of California, 17 Cal.App.4th 462 (Cal. App. 1993) (Rule 8.104 discretionary vs mandatory)
  • Walker v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, 35 Cal.4th 15 (Cal. 2005) (liberality in notices of appeal; relief context)
  • Allabach v. Santa Clara County Fair Assn., 46 Cal.App.4th 1007 (Cal. App. 1996) (relief where failure to perfect caused procedural defect)
  • Lester v. Lennane, 84 Cal.App.4th 536 (Cal. App. 2000) (appealability statements and misleads in briefing)
  • Boyer v. Jensen, 129 Cal.App.4th 62 (Cal. App. 2005) (judgment review when appeal challenged on timing)
  • Modica v. Merin, 234 Cal.App.3d 1072 (Cal. App. 1991) (discretion to salvage defective appeals)
  • Evola v. Wendt Construction Co., 158 Cal.App.2d 658 (Cal. App. 1958) (rendition of judgment concept in appeals)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Good v. Miller
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Mar 13, 2013
Citations: 214 Cal. App. 4th 472; 153 Cal. Rptr. 3d 848; 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 189; 2013 WL 953005; No. C068802
Docket Number: No. C068802
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
Log In