Gonzalez v. State
2017 ND 109
| N.D. | 2017Background
- Gonzalez pled guilty in 2004 to two counts of Gross Sexual Imposition, was sentenced and placed on probation; probation was revoked in 2011 and he was resentenced.
- He pursued multiple post-conviction applications and appeals challenging plea/ revocation procedures; prior petitions led to a new revocation hearing in 2014.
- In 2014 the State again sought revocation; Gonzalez moved to suppress, counsel was appointed, suppression denied, and probation was revoked; this Court affirmed.
- Gonzalez filed his fourth post-conviction application in Dec. 2015 claiming ineffective assistance during the suppression hearing, revocation hearing, and direct appeal.
- The district court granted the State’s motion for summary judgment in Sept. 2016 after inviting the State to move to dismiss as an apparent misuse of process/untimely petition; Gonzalez did not respond and no evidentiary hearing was held.
- Gonzalez appealed, arguing the district court’s order lacked adequate findings of fact and conclusions of law and erred in granting summary judgment.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether district court made sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law under N.D.C.C. § 29‑32.1‑11 | Gonzalez: order was insufficiently detailed and failed to state reasons for denial | State: summary judgment dismissal was appropriate because petition was untimely and an abuse/misuse of process; prior proceedings raised same issues | Affirmed. Court held the record (prior proceedings, court invitation for motion, State’s motion) made district court’s reasoning ascertainable despite terse order |
| Whether summary judgment was proper without an evidentiary hearing | Gonzalez: needed evidentiary hearing and response to State’s motion | State: no genuine issue of material fact; affirmative defenses (untimeliness, misuse) warranted dismissal | Affirmed. Court concluded summary disposition was appropriate under N.D.R.Crim.P. 11 / N.D.C.C. § 29‑32.1‑09(3) because no genuine factual dispute remained |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Gonzalez, 799 N.W.2d 402 (N.D. 2011) (prior appeal affirming probation revocation/resentence)
- Gonzalez v. State, 865 N.W.2d 123 (N.D. 2015) (appeal affirming denial of first post‑conviction petition)
- State v. Gonzalez, 862 N.W.2d 535 (N.D. 2015) (appeal affirming revocation after suppression denial)
- Gonzalez v. State, 888 N.W.2d 205 (N.D. 2016) (appeal affirming denial of an earlier ineffective‑assistance post‑conviction claim)
