History
  • No items yet
midpage
798 F.3d 26
1st Cir.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Faustino González-Oyarzun sued his employers in federal court under the ADEA and Puerto Rico law; defendants moved to dismiss based on a separation agreement forum-selection clause requiring litigation in Puerto Rico state court.
  • González-Oyarzun argued the forum-selection clause was invalid because Puerto Rico does not provide civil jury trials and he had not waived his Seventh Amendment right.
  • The district court ordered supplemental briefing on whether the Seventh Amendment applies to Puerto Rico, and notified the Commonwealth and its Office of Courts Administration.
  • The district court held the forum-selection clause valid and dismissed the case, but also entered a declaratory judgment that Puerto Rico must afford civil litigants the Seventh Amendment jury right (incorporation via Fourteenth Amendment).
  • The Commonwealth and the Office of Courts Administration appealed only the declaratory-judgment portion; González-Oyarzun did not appeal the dismissal or forum-selection ruling.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Puerto Rico must provide Seventh Amendment civil jury trials (i.e., is the Seventh Amendment incorporated against the states/Commonwealth) González-Oyarzun: The Seventh Amendment right applies and was not waived; thus forum-selection clause that funnels him to a non-jury forum is invalid Commonwealth/OCA: Existing Supreme Court precedent holds states need not provide Seventh Amendment civil jury trials; district court lacked basis to declare otherwise The court vacated the district court's declaratory judgment because it conflicted with controlling Supreme Court precedent that states are not constitutionally required to provide civil jury trials; remanded for amended judgment
Whether the district court properly issued a declaratory judgment sua sponte on this constitutional question González-Oyarzun: Implicitly supported exploring Seventh Amendment issue to resolve forum clause dispute Commonwealth/OCA: District court should not have decided a constitutional issue neither party requested and may have lacked jurisdictional basis to involve them The panel noted discretion concerns and that issuing such declaratory relief was at least questionable, but the judgment was vacated on precedent grounds rather than solely on discretionary error
Whether McDonald v. City of Chicago overruled prior Seventh Amendment incorporation cases González-Oyarzun: Argued implication that McDonald supports incorporation Commonwealth/OCA: McDonald did not overrule prior Seventh Amendment precedent Held: McDonald did not overrule prior cases; stare decisis and prior Supreme Court decisions remain controlling
Whether Eleventh or other sovereign-immunity issues barred the declaratory judgment Commonwealth/OCA: Raised Eleventh Amendment and related jurisdictional defenses Gonzalez: Did not press an appeal on dismissal; district court had added Commonwealth entities and appellants delayed arguing service defects The panel avoided resolving Eleventh Amendment questions because the merits issue (conflict with Supreme Court precedent) was dispositive

Key Cases Cited

  • City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd., 526 U.S. 687 (states not required to provide civil jury trials)
  • Gasperini v. Ctr. for Humanities, Inc., 518 U.S. 415 (limits on applying federal standards to state-law damages; discusses jury-trial issues)
  • Wagner Elec. Mfg. Co. v. Lyndon, 262 U.S. 226 (early precedent on non-incorporation of Seventh Amendment)
  • Minneapolis & St. Louis R.R. Co. v. Bombolis, 241 U.S. 211 (Seventh Amendment not binding on states)
  • McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (incorporation doctrine; did not overrule prior Seventh Amendment decisions)
  • Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (example of incorporation of other constitutional rights against states)
  • Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/Am. Express, Inc., 490 U.S. 477 (lower courts must follow directly controlling Supreme Court precedent)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Gonzalez-Oyarzun v. Office of the Courts Administ
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date Published: Aug 17, 2015
Citations: 798 F.3d 26; 127 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1538; 2015 WL 4881092; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14425; 14-1954, 14-1971
Docket Number: 14-1954, 14-1971
Court Abbreviation: 1st Cir.
Log In