History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gomez v. Superior Court
54 Cal. 4th 293
| Cal. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Gomez, an inmate, filed a petition for writ of mandate in Lassen Superior Court to compel processing of four grievance appeals.
  • Juarez, another inmate, filed a petition for writ of mandate for three grievance appeals regarding incidents and confiscated property.
  • Commissioner Dawson Arnold denied Gomez's petition and struck his objection; he denied Juarez's petition as habeas corpus after conversion.
  • Court of Appeal consolidated the cases and issued an alternative writ; the Attorney General argued commissioners lack authority to issue final denials.
  • Superior Court and Attorney General contended section 259, subdivision (a) authorizes ex parte determinations by commissioners; the Court of Appeal agreed.
  • California Supreme Court held that section 259(a) grants authority to commissioners to deny writ petitions on ex parte basis and that such denial can be a valid final action within subordinate judicial duties.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Authority of commissioners to deny writ petitions ex parte Gomez/Juarez argue no ex parte denial authority Respondents; section 259(a) authorizes hearing and determining ex parte motions for writs Yes; commissioners may deny writ petitions ex parte
Constitutionality of section 259(a) Denial by commissioner as final judgment exceeds subordinate duties Constitution permits subordinate judicial duties for commissioners Constitutional; preserves preexisting powers as subordinate duties
Scope of petition type not collaterally attacking conviction Clark restricts commissioner authority in collateral attacks Clark distinguished; here petitions seek prisoner rights not challenging conviction Applicable; authority extends to non-collateral petition contexts

Key Cases Cited

  • Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp., 10 Cal.3d 351 (1973) (subordinate judicial duties permitted for uncontested or prescribed matters)
  • In re Kathy P., 25 Cal.3d 91 (1979) (juvenile traffic hearing officers’ authority; uncontested/contested matters distinction)
  • People v. Lucas, 82 Cal.App.3d 47 (1978) (commissioners’ authority in traffic infractions; uncontested/contested distinction)
  • In re Clark, 5 Cal.4th 750 (1993) (limits on successive habeas petitions; finality and miscarriage contexts)
  • Gomez v. Superior Court, Cal. State Supreme Court (this opinion) (2012) (commissioners may hear and determine ex parte writ petitions; constitutional and historical analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Gomez v. Superior Court
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 18, 2012
Citation: 54 Cal. 4th 293
Docket Number: S179176
Court Abbreviation: Cal.