History
  • No items yet
midpage
Golub v. Golub
2012 Ohio 2509
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Decedent Phoebe Golub revised her will in 2006 to split equally among three sons, Joel, Mark, and Robert.
  • Robert died in 2007, leaving plaintiffs Drew and Samantha as his issue.
  • A June-July 2007 sequence produced two wills: a draft allocating one-third to Mark and Joel (unsigned) and a later will disinheriting plaintiffs in favor of Mark and Joel.
  • Decedent executed the July 20, 2007 will disinheriting plaintiffs; copies were sent to Mark and Joel.
  • Decedent died June 15, 2009; plaintiffs challenged the will alleging undue influence; trial court granted summary judgment for defendants in 2011.
  • Appeal challenges the summary judgment ruling, asserting issues about susceptibility, undue influence, and confidential relationships.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether summary judgment on undue influence was proper Golub argues unresolved facts on susceptibility and actual influence Golub contends evidence shows no susceptibility or actual exertion Summary judgment proper; no genuine issues on undue influence
Whether the trial court applied the correct standard for undue influence Plaintiffs claim the standard improperly required lack of capacity and susceptibility Court correctly used susceptibility standard and did not err Court applied correct legal standard; no confidential relationship established

Key Cases Cited

  • West v. Henry, 173 Ohio St. 498 (Ohio Supreme Court 1962) (elements of undue influence and when it applies to wills)
  • Feiler v. Feiler, 149 Ohio St. 17 (Ohio Supreme Court 1948) (testator's disposition subject to testamentary freedom unless undue influence shown)
  • Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co., 77 Ohio St.3d 102 (Ohio Supreme Court 1996) (summary judgment standard and Dresher framework)
  • Dresher v. Burt, 75 Ohio St.3d 280 (Ohio Supreme Court 1996) (burden on moving party and reciprocal burden on nonmovant under Civ.R. 56)
  • Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, 82 Ohio St.3d 367 (Ohio Supreme Court 1998) (summary judgment standard and motion burden)
  • Horton v. Harwick Chem. Corp., 653 N.E.2d 1196 (Ohio Supreme Court 1995) (three-part summary judgment test)
  • West v. Henry, 173 Ohio St. 498 (Ohio Supreme Court 1962) (undue influence elements and requisite showing)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Golub v. Golub
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 7, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 2509
Docket Number: 97603
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.