Gohar Aslanyan
17-24195
Bankr. E.D. Cal.Dec 20, 2017Background
- Debtor Gohar Aslanyan filed Chapter 7 on June 26, 2017; Transport Funding, LLC holds a judicial lien (writ of attachment) recorded >90 days before the petition securing ~ $39,963.48.
- Property: single-family home in Carmichael, CA; unavoidable mortgage senior lien $360,124; debtor claims $100,000 homestead exemption.
- The only disputed factual issue was the market value of the home: debtor argued $460,000 (broker testimony), Transport argued $495,000 (appraiser testimony).
- Court received testimony from the debtor’s listing broker (offers received after petition) and Transport’s appraiser; latest post-petition offer was $479,000 (Dec. 16, 2017).
- Applying 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(2)(A): whether the judicial lien impairs the exemption depends on property value as of the petition date; court determined market value of $479,000 as of the petition date.
- Result: with $479,000 value, $21,087.48 of Transport’s lien impairs the exemption and is avoidable; $18,876 of the lien remains. Transport’s motion for relief from stay was dismissed as moot because the trustee abandoned the house and the debtor’s discharge entered.
Issues
| Issue | Debtor's Argument | Transport's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Transport’s judicial lien is avoidable under 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1)(A) given exemptions and senior liens | Debtor: home value $460,000 → lien fully impairs exemption and is avoidable | Transport: home value $495,000 → most of lien survives | Court: value $479,000 → $21,087.48 impairs exemption; that portion avoided, $18,876 survives |
| Proper valuation date and admissible evidence for § 522(a)(2) valuation | Debtor: may rely on broker testimony and post-petition offers if market unchanged | Transport: post-petition offer unreliable; appraisal shows higher value | Court: value determined as of petition date; post-petition $479,000 offer admissible because market conditions unchanged and broker testimony credible |
| Whether hypothetical sale/closing costs should reduce market value for lien-avoidance calculation | Debtor: transaction costs not to be deducted from market value | Transport: buyer-paid costs reduce debtor’s realized value (argues for lower net) | Court: transactional/closing costs are not deducted; market value is not reduced by hypothetical sale costs |
| Motion for relief from automatic stay to perfect lien | Transport sought leave to return to state court to obtain judgment to perfect attachment | Debtor opposed | Court: motion dismissed as moot — trustee abandoned property and discharge entered, so stay expired and nothing remains to modify |
Key Cases Cited
- In re Chiu, 266 B.R. 743 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2001) (valuation for exemption and lien-avoidance determined as of petition date)
- In re Dodge, 138 B.R. 602 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 1992) (same principle on valuation date for exemptions)
- In re Southern California Plastics, Inc., 165 F.3d 1243 (9th Cir. 1999) (discussion of judgment lien perfection and post-petition lien issues)
