History
  • No items yet
midpage
CUMcv-24-266
Me. Super. Ct
Oct 21, 2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Sandra K. Goddard filed a civil complaint against Benjamin P. Campo, Esquire, and David J. Marchese, Esquire, on June 24, 2024.
  • Goddard was granted a fee waiver for filing the complaint.
  • The record indicates attempts at service on Defendant Marchese, but proof of proper service was lacking for both defendants.
  • Goddard sought default judgment of $300,000 against Marcheese, alleging failure to respond.
  • Attorney for Marchese informed the court he was not properly served under Maine Civil Rules.
  • The court reviewed compliance with service and filing requirements pursuant to Maine Rules of Civil Procedure.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Proper service on defendants Goddard alleges service was completed Marchese asserts no proper service Service requirements not met
Timeliness of proof of service Service was attempted and documented Proof is procedurally deficient Proof of timely, proper service lacking
Default/default judgment Sought default for failure to respond Response predicated on improper service Default judgment denied
Dismissal for lack of service No request for enlargement yet No timely or proper service filed Case to be dismissed if not remedied

Key Cases Cited

  • Jackson v. Borkowski, 627 A.2d 1010 (Me. 1993) (court considers length of delay and other relevant factors before dismissing for lack of timely service)
  • Qualey v. Secretary of State, 628 A.2d 1035 (Me. 1993) (whether complaint is frivolous is relevant to dismissal analysis)
  • Town of Ogunquit v. Dept. of Public Safety, 767 A.2d 291 (Me. 2001) (failure to timely serve defendant may deprive court of personal jurisdiction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Goddard v. Campo
Court Name: Superior Court of Maine
Date Published: Oct 21, 2024
Citation: CUMcv-24-266
Docket Number: CUMcv-24-266
Court Abbreviation: Me. Super. Ct
Log In
    Goddard v. Campo, CUMcv-24-266