History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gloria Jane Miller v. Advantage Behavioral Health Systems
677 F. App'x 556
11th Cir.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Gloria Jane Miller sued Advantage Behavioral Health Systems (a Georgia community service board, “CSB”) under the ADEA, alleging age-based wrongful termination in 2010. Advantage moved to dismiss on Eleventh Amendment immunity grounds after discovery; the district court denied the motion.
  • Advantage is created by Georgia statute, labeled an "instrumentality of the state" but also statutorily given the "same immunity as provided for counties," and is overseen at a high level by the Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities (DBHDD).
  • Day-to-day governance, hiring/firing, budgeting, and personnel decisions are controlled by locally appointed Governing Boards and an Executive Director; the State’s role is limited to high-level oversight and approval of the Executive Director’s selection and compensation.
  • Advantage asserted it was an “arm of the State” and therefore entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity from Miller’s ADEA claim; the district court rejected that claim and this court reviews that denial de novo.
  • The Eleventh Circuit applied the four-factor Manders test (state law definition; state control over the function; source of funding; who pays judgments) focused on the specific function at issue—hiring and firing.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Advantage is an "arm of the State" entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity for Miller's termination Miller: Advantage acted independently in personnel decisions and is not a state arm Advantage: CSBs are statutory state instrumentalities and receive state funding, so they qualify as state arms Court: Not an arm of the State; immunity denied
How Georgia law classifies CSBs for Manders factor 1 Miller: State statutory labels and Youngblood don't make Advantage an arm for federal immunity Advantage: Statute calls CSBs "instrumentalities" and Georgia Supreme Court treated CSBs as state agencies under state law Held: Georgia law is mixed but Youngblood suggests state-agency status; factor only weakly favors immunity and does not control outcome
Whether the State controls hiring/firing (Manders factor 2) Miller: Local Governing Board and Executive Director control personnel; state control is limited Advantage: Commissioner approves Executive Director and state sets some standards, implying meaningful control Held: Factor weighs against immunity—state involvement is high-level only; local control over day-to-day personnel predominates
Whether the State would ultimately bear liability for judgments (Manders factor 4) Miller: Statute disclaims state liability for CSB debts; State unlikely obligated to prop up CSB Advantage: An adverse judgment would indirectly implicate state treasury and service provision in the region Held: Factor strongly against immunity—Georgia law disclaims state liability and Advantage failed to show the State would be forced to absorb judgments

Key Cases Cited

  • Manders v. Lee, 338 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2003) (sets four-factor test for arm-of-the-state analysis under the Eleventh Amendment)
  • Lightfoot v. Henry County School District, 771 F.3d 764 (11th Cir. 2014) (assessing Manders factors and emphasizing local control over state-control indicators)
  • Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 (U.S. 2000) (holding Congress did not validly abrogate state Eleventh Amendment immunity under the ADEA)
  • Pellitteri v. Prine, 776 F.3d 777 (11th Cir. 2015) (finding state control over a sheriff’s office supported immunity where the State tightly regulated hiring and discipline)
  • U.S. ex rel. Lesinski v. South Fla. Water Mgmt. Dist., 739 F.3d 598 (11th Cir. 2014) (considering whether state would need to increase appropriations to cover a water district’s liabilities)
  • Garrett v. University of Alabama at Birmingham Board of Trustees, 344 F.3d 1288 (11th Cir. 2003) (standard of review: de novo for denial of sovereign-immunity defense)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Gloria Jane Miller v. Advantage Behavioral Health Systems
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Jan 26, 2017
Citation: 677 F. App'x 556
Docket Number: 15-15496 Non-Argument Calendar
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.