History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gill v. Kirresh (In Re Gill)
574 B.R. 709
| 9th Cir. BAP | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtor Cecil C. Gill owned a Beaverton, Oregon residence purchased in 2009; mortgage note held by Rana Kirresh. Debtor converted his Chapter 13 to Chapter 7 and received a discharge; Stephen Arnot is the Chapter 7 trustee.
  • Kirresh held a first deed of trust (≈$371,000 at time of litigation). The IRS filed a secured proof of claim for unpaid income taxes (assessments for tax years 2005–2011), including about $48,276 in tax penalties.
  • Trustee moved to sell the Residence free and clear under § 363(f), pay the mortgage, and have the IRS lien attach to remaining proceeds; Trustee proposed to avoid/subordinate the penalty portion of the IRS lien under §§ 724(a), 726(a)(4) and preserve it under § 551 for unsecured creditors.
  • Debtor moved to compel abandonment under § 554(b), arguing the property was burdensome or of inconsequential value (claiming $500,000 value but $650,000+ encumbrances and repair costs).
  • Bankruptcy court heard competing valuations (trustee’s broker $539,000; Classic report $434k–$516k; Debtor scheduled $500,000), found the Residence worth $500,000, concluded sale would produce substantial value for unsecured creditors, and denied the motion to abandon. Debtor appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Gill) Defendant's Argument (Trustee) Held
Was the bankruptcy court’s valuation of the Residence erroneous? Gill: court erred; his $500,000 excluded ~$75,000 repairs so true value ≈ $425,000, leaving no distributable equity. Trustee: evidence supported $500,000 valuation; court reasonably discounted comps for repairs and relied on Debtor’s schedule plus broker analysis. Court: No clear error; $500,000 value adopted.
Could the trustee avoid and preserve the penalty portion of the IRS tax lien for unsecured creditors? Gill: Trustee offered no proof IRS consent to sell free and clear or to subordinate lien; penalties shouldn’t be preserved for unsecured creditors without consent. Trustee: §§ 724(a), 726(a)(4) authorize trustee to avoid lien to extent it secures penalties, and § 551 preserves avoided liens for estate—no IRS consent required to subordinate penalty portion. Court: Held trustee could avoid/subordinate penalty portion and preserve it for unsecured creditors; sale would yield substantial value.

Key Cases Cited

  • Holloway v. Internal Revenue Serv. (In re Odom Antennas, Inc.), 340 F.3d 705 (8th Cir.) (trustee may avoid lien portion securing tax penalties and protect unsecured creditors)
  • In re Bolden, 327 B.R. 657 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2005) (denying debtor’s motion to compel abandonment where trustee could avoid and preserve tax-penalty portions of liens for unsecured creditors)
  • Simonson v. Granquist, 369 U.S. 38 (U.S. 1962) (doctrine that innocent creditors should not be punished by enforcement of penalties against a debtor’s estate)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Gill v. Kirresh (In Re Gill)
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 26, 2017
Citation: 574 B.R. 709
Docket Number: BAP OR-16-1300-BJuF; Bk. 3:16-bk-30589-RLD
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir. BAP