midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
2010 Ohio 6407
Ohio Ct. App.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Gilham contracted with Stasiulewicz to replace concrete around her pool and later to replace underground pool pipes after the concrete work began.
  • The work included multiple cement pours, with a second cement pour replacing the first at Appellee's expense and Oliver replacing the pool liner afterward.
  • Problems emerged: water collected behind the liner and the pump failed; tests indicated some lines did not hold pressure.
  • Evidence at trial showed disputed issues about fittings (pressure vs. non-pressure), adhesive color, backfill material (gravel vs. clay), pipe depth, and whether lines were resting on virgin soil.
  • The trial court found no breach of contract or CSPA violation based on its assessment of credibility and evidentiary connections between Appellee’s work and the leaks.
  • On appeal, the Seventh District sustained some CSPA issues, ordered remand on attorney fees, and affirmed the breach-of-contract finding.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was the contract breach finding against the manifest weight of the evidence? Gilham contends substandard work and leaks show breach. Appellee argues evidence does not prove unworkmanlike performance or causation. No manifest weight breach; evidence supports trial court.
Did Appellee violate the CSPA and are statutory damages warranted? CSPA violations occurred due to failures to provide estimates and itemized repairs. No CSPA violation shown beyond other issues; damages not established. CSPA violations proven; $800 awarded on statutory violations; remand for attorney fees.
Should attorney fees be awarded to Gilham for the CSPA claim? Prevailing party entitled to attorney fees for knowing violations. Attorney fees to be determined after remand; knowledge standard met by intentional act. Remanded for trial court to determine whether attorney fees are warranted.

Key Cases Cited

  • C.E. Morris Co. v. Foley Constr. Co., 54 Ohio St.2d 279 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1978) (manifest weight standard for civil cases)
  • Seasons Coal Co., Inc. v. Cleveland, 10 Ohio St.3d 77 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1984) (credibility and manifest weight framework for bench trials)
  • Velotta v. Leo Petronzio Landscaping, Inc., 69 Ohio St.2d 376 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1982) (breach of service contract; workmanlike performance standard)
  • Einhorn v. Ford Motor Co., 48 Ohio St.3d 27 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1990) (attorney-fee award for statutory violations; knowledge not required)
  • Cent. Motors Corp. v. Pepper Pike, 73 Ohio St.3d 581 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995) (appraisal of conflicting trial evidence and standard of review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Gilham v. Stasiulewicz
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 23, 2010
Citations: 2010 Ohio 6407; 09 JE 25
Docket Number: 09 JE 25
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In