Gibson v. State
288 Ga. 617
| Ga. | 2011Background
- Gibson was convicted by a jury of felony murder, armed robbery, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime for a Kwik Way store robbery where the clerk, Patel, was killed.
- Evidence included Gibson’s fingerprints, the cash register, shell casing, and a gun recovered; Gibson later directed police to the gun and pistol grip; Grant testified Gibson admitted shooting Patel.
- During deliberations, jurors requested all evidence through exhibit 72; the court refused to provide all exhibits, citing potential harm and the need to avoid retrial.
- The trial court stated some evidence was 'disadvantageous' to have in the jury room and referenced potential appellate review, implying outcomes if errors occurred.
- Gibson argued the court’s remarks violated OCGA § 17-8-57 by intimating an opinion on guilt and by referencing appellate review; the Court of Appeals reversed, finding reversible error.
- The Georgia Supreme Court reversed the conviction, holding that the trial court’s statements were reversible error and directing reversal of the judgment.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the trial court's reference to appellate review during jury deliberations was reversible error | Gibson | Gibson | Yes, reversible error requiring reversal |
Key Cases Cited
- Faust v. State, 222 Ga. 27 (1966) (reversible error when trial court mentions appellate review)
- Walker v. State, 255 Ga. 251 (1985) (distinguishes Faust on waiver and non-objected, inadvertent references)
- Mitchell v. State, 22 Ga. 211 (1857) (caution against references to power of reviewing courts)
- Bryant v. State, 197 Ga. 641 (1944) (admonition against references to the Supreme Court; warning of error)
- Price v. State, 149 Ga. App. 397 (1979) (warning about statements implying appellate outcomes)
- Patel v. State, 282 Ga. 412 (2007) (reversal when judge intimates guilt under OCGA § 17-8-57)
