midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
953 N.E.2d 391
Oh. Ct. Com. Pl., Lucas
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • In December 2004, Linda Kramer rear-ended Carolyn Gibson, who sued for personal injury damages.
  • The defendant admitted liability; Gibson claimed neck surgery, PTSD, eye damage, and chronic pain, supported by multiple medical experts and records of about $30,000 in past medical expenses.
  • At trial, Gibson sought $312,374; the jury found damages totaling $17,000 with $7,500 for economic loss and $9,500 for noneconomic loss.
  • Gibson moved for a new trial under Civ.R. 59(A)(4) and (A)(6) arguing inadequate damages and weight of the evidence; the court denied the motion.
  • Gibson also moved to tax deposition and related litigation expenses as costs; the court granted this in part, ordering Kramer to pay $2,541.10 in costs.
  • The court noted costs are governed by Civ.R. 54(D) and considered prevailing-party determinations under several methods.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the verdict warranted a new trial for damages. Gibson argues damages were inadequate and prejudiced. Kramer contends the verdict reflects weight of the evidence and should not be disturbed. New trial denied; verdict sustained by weight of the evidence.
Who is the prevailing party for purposes of costs. Gibson was prevailing since she recovered a verdict in her favor. Kramer argues plaintiff was not prevailing because settlement offer before trial exceeded the verdict. Gibson is prevailing; costs awarded to Gibson.
What deposition and related expenses are taxable as costs. All deposition expenses, including transcripts, are taxable as costs. Some deposition-related fees (attendance) are not taxable as costs. Deposition expenses of doctors and certain transcripts taxed; attendance fees not, totaling $2,541.10.

Key Cases Cited

  • Pena v. Northeast Ohio Emergency Affiliates, 108 Ohio App.3d 96 (1995) (damages must show passion/prejudice to grant new trial)
  • Fields v. Dailey, 68 Ohio App.3d 33 (1990) (considerations for judging damages and improper influence on jury)
  • Fromson & Davis Co. v. Reider, 127 Ohio St. 564 (1934) (situs for weight-of-evidence standard and jury influence)
  • Porter v. Keefe, 2003-Ohio-7267 (6th Dist.) (framework for Civ.R. 59(A)(4) review of damages)
  • Hagemeyer v. Sadowski, 86 Ohio App.3d 563 (1993) (prevailing party determination under Civ.R. 54(D))
  • Vance v. Roedersheimer, 64 Ohio St.3d 552 (1992) (recovery of arbitration/settlement context not controlling)
  • Wigglesworth v. St. Joseph Riverside Hosp., 143 Ohio App.3d 143 (2001) (preserves prevailing party status notwithstanding small damages)
  • Brinn v. Cutter, 1993 WL 515636 (8th Dist.) (illustrates prevailing party concept with modest damages)
  • Barrett v. Singer, 60 Ohio St.2d 7 (1979) (deposition expenses and related costs generally taxable when used as evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Gibson v. Kramer
Court Name: Lucas County Court of Common Pleas
Date Published: Feb 28, 2011
Citations: 953 N.E.2d 391; 164 Ohio Misc. 2d 55; No. CI09-5411
Docket Number: No. CI09-5411
Court Abbreviation: Oh. Ct. Com. Pl., Lucas
Log In