953 N.E.2d 391
Oh. Ct. Com. Pl., Lucas2011Background
- In December 2004, Linda Kramer rear-ended Carolyn Gibson, who sued for personal injury damages.
- The defendant admitted liability; Gibson claimed neck surgery, PTSD, eye damage, and chronic pain, supported by multiple medical experts and records of about $30,000 in past medical expenses.
- At trial, Gibson sought $312,374; the jury found damages totaling $17,000 with $7,500 for economic loss and $9,500 for noneconomic loss.
- Gibson moved for a new trial under Civ.R. 59(A)(4) and (A)(6) arguing inadequate damages and weight of the evidence; the court denied the motion.
- Gibson also moved to tax deposition and related litigation expenses as costs; the court granted this in part, ordering Kramer to pay $2,541.10 in costs.
- The court noted costs are governed by Civ.R. 54(D) and considered prevailing-party determinations under several methods.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the verdict warranted a new trial for damages. | Gibson argues damages were inadequate and prejudiced. | Kramer contends the verdict reflects weight of the evidence and should not be disturbed. | New trial denied; verdict sustained by weight of the evidence. |
| Who is the prevailing party for purposes of costs. | Gibson was prevailing since she recovered a verdict in her favor. | Kramer argues plaintiff was not prevailing because settlement offer before trial exceeded the verdict. | Gibson is prevailing; costs awarded to Gibson. |
| What deposition and related expenses are taxable as costs. | All deposition expenses, including transcripts, are taxable as costs. | Some deposition-related fees (attendance) are not taxable as costs. | Deposition expenses of doctors and certain transcripts taxed; attendance fees not, totaling $2,541.10. |
Key Cases Cited
- Pena v. Northeast Ohio Emergency Affiliates, 108 Ohio App.3d 96 (1995) (damages must show passion/prejudice to grant new trial)
- Fields v. Dailey, 68 Ohio App.3d 33 (1990) (considerations for judging damages and improper influence on jury)
- Fromson & Davis Co. v. Reider, 127 Ohio St. 564 (1934) (situs for weight-of-evidence standard and jury influence)
- Porter v. Keefe, 2003-Ohio-7267 (6th Dist.) (framework for Civ.R. 59(A)(4) review of damages)
- Hagemeyer v. Sadowski, 86 Ohio App.3d 563 (1993) (prevailing party determination under Civ.R. 54(D))
- Vance v. Roedersheimer, 64 Ohio St.3d 552 (1992) (recovery of arbitration/settlement context not controlling)
- Wigglesworth v. St. Joseph Riverside Hosp., 143 Ohio App.3d 143 (2001) (preserves prevailing party status notwithstanding small damages)
- Brinn v. Cutter, 1993 WL 515636 (8th Dist.) (illustrates prevailing party concept with modest damages)
- Barrett v. Singer, 60 Ohio St.2d 7 (1979) (deposition expenses and related costs generally taxable when used as evidence)
