History
  • No items yet
midpage
877 N.W.2d 124
Iowa
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiffs (Young, Haigh, Runyon) sued HealthPort alleging fees charged to produce medical records and billing statements exceeded limits in Iowa Code §622.10(6).
  • HealthPort is a vendor contracted by healthcare providers to fulfill records requests; plaintiffs allege HealthPort required payment of excess per-page, basic, and electronic delivery fees before releasing records.
  • HealthPort moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim, arguing the statute governs only "providers" and does not limit fees charged by non-provider vendors.
  • The district court denied the motion to dismiss; HealthPort sought interlocutory appeal, which the Iowa Supreme Court granted.
  • The petition pleads facts (treated as true on a motion to dismiss) that HealthPort acted as an agent of providers when fulfilling requests, and thus may be bound by the statute’s fee limits.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Iowa Code §622.10(6) limits fees charged by a non-provider vendor fulfilling records requests for a provider The statute limits fees for any entity that produces records under a provider’s request; HealthPort must comply when acting on providers’ behalf The statute applies only to entities that meet the statutory definition of "provider," so HealthPort (a vendor) is not regulated The court affirmed denial of dismissal: on pleaded facts HealthPort acted as provider agents, and agents cannot charge more than providers may legally charge under §622.10(6)

Key Cases Cited

  • Cotton v. Med-Cor Health Information Solutions, Inc., 472 S.E.2d 92 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996) (entities fulfilling provider records requests cannot charge fees greater than statute permits for providers)
  • Pratt v. Smart Corp., 968 S.W.2d 868 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997) (vendor acting as hospital’s agent cannot do what hospital is forbidden to do by statute)
  • C & J Vantage Leasing Co. v. Wolfe, 795 N.W.2d 65 (Iowa 2011) (agency principles: actual and apparent authority)
  • Cutler v. Klass, Whicher & Mishne, 473 N.W.2d 178 (Iowa 1991) (courts should avoid premature dismissals; many factual disputes better resolved post-pleading)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Gerald P. Young, Michael L. Haigh, and Suzanne M. Runyon, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Healthport Technologies, Inc.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Iowa
Date Published: Mar 18, 2016
Citations: 877 N.W.2d 124; 2016 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 33; 14–1918
Docket Number: 14–1918
Court Abbreviation: Iowa
Log In
    Gerald P. Young, Michael L. Haigh, and Suzanne M. Runyon, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Healthport Technologies, Inc., 877 N.W.2d 124