Georgia-Pacific, LLC v. Fields
293 Ga. 499
| Ga. | 2013Background
- Rhonda Fields developed peritoneal mesothelioma and alleged childhood exposure to asbestos from products made or distributed by multiple companies, including Georgia-Pacific and Union Carbide.
- The Fields originally named several companies in pleadings and Mrs. Fields completed a sworn information form (OCGA § 51-14-7) identifying additional potential manufacturers/distributors.
- The Fields later settled with some entities and amended pleadings to omit five specific nonparty entities (Central Moloney, Nehring, Phelps Dodge/BICC/General Cable, Southern States, Southwire).
- The Fields moved for partial summary judgment to preclude Defendants from attributing fault to those nonparties on the jury apportionment form; the trial court granted the motion and the Court of Appeals affirmed.
- Defendants argued they could rely on admissions/allegations in the Fields’ original pleadings and sworn information form to show exposure to the nonparties’ products and thus defeat summary judgment.
- The Supreme Court granted certiorari, reversed, and held the Court of Appeals erred in excluding those pleadings-as-admissions and in misapplying the “right for any reason” rule.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether allegations/admissions in Fields’ pleadings and sworn information form may be used as evidence to defeat summary judgment on nonparty apportionment | Fields: Allegations (and sworn form stating "best of her knowledge and belief") are not admissible evidence for summary judgment; amendments withdrawing allegations negate their evidentiary effect | Defendants: Prior pleadings and sworn information form constitute admissions in judicio or otherwise admissible and may be used to show exposure to nonparties | Court: Admissions/ allegations in the pleadings are admissible as evidence against the pleader even if based on belief; withdrawal does not eliminate opposing party’s right to use the original admission |
| Whether defendants also had to submit expert evidence on causation to defeat the Fields’ motion on nonparty fault | Fields: Motion targeted lack of evidence of exposure to nonparties, not causation; movant met burden so summary judgment proper | Defendants: Even if exposure shown by pleadings, they must produce evidence (expert) linking those exposures to disease to avoid summary judgment | Court: Not required at that stage — movant bore burden to show no evidence of exposure; nonmovants need not produce affirmative evidence until movant meets its burden; causation was not raised as ground in Fields’ motion so “right for any reason” cannot be used to affirm |
Key Cases Cited
- Jones v. City of Willacoochee, 299 Ga. App. 741 (court of appeals decision on pleadings vs. evidence)
- Fletcher v. Hatcher, 278 Ga. App. 91 (verification based on "knowledge and belief" treated cautiously for summary judgment)
- Mims v. Jones, 135 Ga. 541 (admissions in pleadings as conclusive when not withdrawn)
- Walker v. Jack Eckerd Corp., 209 Ga. App. 517 (admissions in pleadings admissible against pleader)
- Howell Mill/Collier Assoc. v. Pennypacker’s, Inc., 194 Ga. App. 169 (distinguishing opinions/conclusions from factual admissions)
- Strozier v. Simmons U.S.A. Corp., 192 Ga. App. 601 (original pleadings’ statements remain evidence even after amendment/withdrawal)
- R.D. Stallion Carpets, Inc. v. Dorsett Indus., L.P., 244 Ga. App. 719 (opposing party may use withdrawn pleading admissions as evidence)
- Woodcraft by MacDonald, Inc. v. Ga. Casualty & Surety Co., 293 Ga. 9 (summary judgment burden rules for movant/nonmovant)
- Macfarlan v. Atlanta Gastroenterology Assoc., Inc., 317 Ga. App. 887 (use of pleadings as admissions in opposing party’s defense)
- Solomon v. Barnett, 281 Ga. 130 (movant’s burden on summary judgment; nonmovant need not produce evidence until that burden is met)
- City of Gainesville v. Dodd, 275 Ga. 834 ("right for any reason" rule in appellate review of summary judgment)
- Anderson v. Jones, 323 Ga. App. 311 (requirements for applying "right for any reason")
- Abellera v. Williamson, 274 Ga. 324 (when appellate courts may affirm on unaddressed grounds)
