History
  • No items yet
midpage
Georgia Dermatologic Surgery Centers, P.C. v. Pharis
323 Ga. App. 181
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • GDSC is equally owned by Pharis and Baucom, who are the sole directors and officers.
  • Baucom and Pharis jointly operated GDSC as equal owners, directors, and key physician-employees.
  • Pharis was terminated for cause on October 26, 2010, without a board or shareholder meeting.
  • Shareholders’ agreement treats a shareholder/employee termination as a “Sale Event” triggering a share sale to the corporation.
  • Bylaws require the board to manage the business and for directors to elect officers; president’s authority is limited to day-to-day operations.
  • Trial court granted partial summary judgment to Pharis on liability for breach of contract/wrongful termination; GDSC appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Baucom had authority to terminate Pharis Pharis GDSC Baucom lacked authority; termination outside president’s power.
Whether Pharis’ share-redemption claim was moot Pharis GDSC moot due to the Pharis termination ruling.
Whether bad-faith attorney fees under OCGA 13-6-11 can be awarded Pharis GDSC Triable issue; evidence supports possible bad faith; denial proper.

Key Cases Cited

  • Fournier v. Fournier, 479 A.2d 708 (R.I. 1984) (president lacks power to terminate owner-director/officer)
  • Glisson Coker, Inc. v. Coker, 260 Ga. App. 270 (Ga. App. 2003) (president’s general authority does not include suing a 50 percent shareholder)
  • Silver Pigeon Properties, LLC v. Fickling & Co., 316 Ga. App. 167 (Ga. App. 2012) (summary judgment standard; de novo review on appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Georgia Dermatologic Surgery Centers, P.C. v. Pharis
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 16, 2013
Citation: 323 Ga. App. 181
Docket Number: A13A0266
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.