309 P.3d 799
Wyo.2013Background
- The Sonnetts purchased a 20‑acre property in Sublette County in 2001 and obtained title insurance from First American; the policy listed several easements but did not mention a "Master Plan."
- The Master Plan had been created in 1989 as part of the county’s approval process to rezone the parcel from Agricultural to Recreational; the county’s rezoning resolution incorporated the Master Plan and it was recorded in the county resolution records.
- The Sonnetts operated a lodge inconsistent with some Master Plan restrictions; in 2006 the county notified them they were violating the Master Plan, and the Sonnetts closed the lodge in 2007.
- The Sonnetts claimed the Master Plan was an encumbrance rendering title unmarketable and also alleged lack of legal access; they submitted a pre‑claim notice to First American, which denied coverage based on policy exclusions for the Sublette County Zoning Resolution and governmental regulations.
- The Sonnetts sued First American for breach of contract (title coverage), negligence, and bad faith; the district court granted summary judgment to First American and dismissed the complaint, and the Sonnetts appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the Master Plan is a covered encumbrance making title unmarketable | Master Plan is a restrictive covenant/encumbrance on title, so policy covers loss | Master Plan is an amendment to Sublette County Zoning Resolution and expressly excluded by the policy | Court: Master Plan is part of zoning resolution and excluded; summary judgment for First American |
| Bad faith denial of coverage | First American unreasonably denied coverage (Master Plan not zoning; also access claim) | Denial was reasonable because policy excludes zoning amendments; investigation was adequate | Court: No bad faith — claim was fairly debatable and investigation was sufficient; summary judgment for First American |
| Negligence (failure to disclose recorded interests) | First American negligently failed to disclose recorded interests/defects | Title insurer’s obligations are contractual; no independent tort duty absent contractual undertaking | Court: Wyoming law bars tort duty where insurance contract governs; summary judgment for First American |
| Procedural challenges (judicial notice of prior order; striking affidavits; ruling before mediation) | District court erred procedurally in taking judicial notice, striking affidavit material, and ruling despite mediation order | Appellate briefing lacked developed argument or authority on these points | Court: Declined to consider these undeveloped arguments; issues waived |
Key Cases Cited
- Elk Ridge Lodge, Inc. v. Sonnett, 254 P.3d 957 (Wyo. 2011) (background facts regarding the Master Plan and property)
- Hulse v. First Am. Title Co. of Crook Cnty., 33 P.3d 122 (Wyo. 2001) (title insurer has no tort duty to search/disclose absent contractual undertaking)
- Matlack v. Mountain W. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 44 P.3d 73 (Wyo. 2002) (bad faith standard: claim must be not fairly debatable; two‑part test)
- Granite Springs Retreat Ass’n, Inc. v. Manning, 133 P.3d 1005 (Wyo. 2006) (restrictive covenants can burden title and affect marketability)
- Bear Fritz Land Co. v. Kachemak Bay Title Agency, Inc., 920 P.2d 759 (Alaska 1996) (distinguishing zoning/regulatory restrictions from title encumbrances)
- Haw River Land & Timber Co. v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 152 F.3d 275 (4th Cir. 1998) (title insurance protects legal title defects, not governmentally imposed use restrictions)
