Garza v. Garza
288 Neb. 213
| Neb. | 2014Background
- Garza filed to modify child support and parenting time; district court found material change in circumstances due to Garza's move to Kansas and adjusted parenting/time arrangements.
- Garza was previously ordered to pay $500/month child support and had alternating weekend visitation.
- Garza moved to Lenexa, Kansas in 2010, leading to allegations that travel and scheduling affected visitation.
- Trial court determined the move was voluntary but found a material change in circumstances; transportation was limited to meet Garza at a location after Garza's employment resumed.
- The court reduced Garza's child support to $305/month and ordered Faust Aman to pay $2,500 in attorney fees; Garza’s request for further reductions and his own attorney fees were denied.
- Garza and Faust Aman cross-appealed on several issues, including transportation, child support calculation, and attorney fees.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visitation transportation arrangement law | Garza | Faust Aman | No error; court did not require immediate half-way transportation. |
| Child support calculation and change in circumstances | Garza | Faust Aman | Material change; reduction to $305/month affirmed. |
| Attorney fees awards | Garza | Faust Aman | Fees awarded; not an abuse of discretion. |
Key Cases Cited
- Caniglia v. Caniglia, 285 Neb. 930, 830 N.W.2d 207 (2013) (related visitation transportation considerations in modification actions)
- Finney v. Finney, 273 Neb. 436, 730 N.W.2d 351 (2007) (standards for modification of dissolution decrees)
- Voichoskie v. Voichoskie, 215 Neb. 775, 340 N.W.2d 442 (1983) (guidelines for income deductions in support calculations)
- Noonan v. Noonan, 261 Neb. 552, 624 N.W.2d 314 (2001) (permissible adjustments under guidelines for benefits/deductions)
- Boamah-Wiafe v. Rashleigh, 9 Neb. App. 503, 614 N.W.2d 778 (2000) (evidence requirements for attorney-fee awards; preferred affidavits)
- Watkins v. Watkins, 285 Neb. 693, 829 N.W.2d 643 (2013) (unclean hands doctrine applicability in modification cases)
