History
  • No items yet
midpage
55 So. 3d 711
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Garner sued Langford on Jan 14, 2005 for injuries from striking a horse owned by Langford and alleged negligent fencing.
  • Garner died on Nov 5, 2007; his mother Elizabeth Delgado was stipulated as proper plaintiff after death.
  • Parties mediated in Jan 2009; settlement negotiations delayed a case management conference set for May 2009.
  • Court continued scheduling into Aug and Dec 2009; mediation was ordered again by the court for Nov 2009.
  • Pantas, Garner’s trial counsel, became ill; transfer of counsel occurred but continuance requests were denied.
  • Witnesses Floyd (trooper) and Baxter (Langford’s veterinarian) were unavailable; attempts to subpoena failed; depositions were not obtained until Dec 23, 2009.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did denial of a continuance cause reversible error? Garner (Delgado) argues denial deprived fair trial due to unavailable witnesses. Langford argues no abuse of discretion; age of case and duty to subpoena justify denial. Yes; reversal required due to injustice from denial.
Were unforeseen illness and substitution of counsel a basis for a continuance? Illness of Pantas and need to replace counsel were unforeseeable and justified delay. No prejudice to Langford; substitution could be arranged without delaying trial. Yes; these factors support denial reversal.
Did the unique sequence of events amount to reversible error despite age of case? Cascade of illness, late substitute counsel, and witnesses' unavailability created a substantial risk of injustice. Age and court efficiency allowed denial absent extraordinary circumstances. Yes; creates reversible error requiring new trial.

Key Cases Cited

  • Fleming v. Fleming, 710 So.2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (factors for abuse of discretion in denying continuance)
  • Shands Teaching Hosp. and Clinics, Inc. v. Dunn, 977 So.2d 594 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (deference to continuance rulings; need for fairness)
  • Silverman v. Millner, 514 So.2d 77 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (unavailability of key witnesses due to illness may necessitate continuance)
  • Baron Auctioneer, Inc. v. Ball, 674 So.2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (denial of continuance when medical reasons near trial is an abuse)
  • Dunn, 977 So.2d 594 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (emphasizes the high deference to continuance decisions and circumstances justifying relief)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Garner v. Langford
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 3, 2011
Citations: 55 So. 3d 711; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2695; 2011 WL 722522; 1D10-1032
Docket Number: 1D10-1032
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In
    Garner v. Langford, 55 So. 3d 711