History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gardner v. Miller
1:25-cv-04970
S.D.N.Y.
Jun 18, 2025
Read the full case

Background:

  • Daquan Gardner, an incarcerated plaintiff at Coxsackie Correctional Facility, filed a pro se civil action in the Southern District of New York.
  • Gardner submitted the complaint without paying the filing fees or including a completed in forma pauperis (IFP) application and prisoner authorization.
  • The Court requires either payment of $405.00 ($350 filing fee + $55 admin fee) or a properly completed IFP application and prisoner authorization for prisoner plaintiffs to proceed.
  • If granted IFP status, the fee (excluding the admin fee) is collected via installment deductions from the prisoner’s account by the correctional facility.
  • Failure to comply with the payment or IFP application requirement within 30 days will result in dismissal of the case.
  • The order also notes that appeals would not be taken in good faith, denying IFP status for appeal purposes.

Issues:

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Gardner can proceed without paying fees Gardner seeks to file as pro se, did not pay fees or file IFP application Not present; administrative action Gardner must pay fee or submit IFP application
Requirements under Prison Litigation Reform Act Gardner did not submit required documentation Not present; administrative action Prisoners must file both IFP and authorization
Consequence for failing to comply Gardner did not address Not present; administrative action Dismissal if no compliance in 30 days
IFP status for appeal purposes Gardner did not request Not present; administrative action Denied; appeal not taken in good faith

Key Cases Cited

  • Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962) (clarifies standard for good faith in appeals from IFP denials)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Gardner v. Miller
Court Name: District Court, S.D. New York
Date Published: Jun 18, 2025
Docket Number: 1:25-cv-04970
Court Abbreviation: S.D.N.Y.