Gardner v. Miller
1:25-cv-04970
S.D.N.Y.Jun 18, 2025Background:
- Daquan Gardner, an incarcerated plaintiff at Coxsackie Correctional Facility, filed a pro se civil action in the Southern District of New York.
- Gardner submitted the complaint without paying the filing fees or including a completed in forma pauperis (IFP) application and prisoner authorization.
- The Court requires either payment of $405.00 ($350 filing fee + $55 admin fee) or a properly completed IFP application and prisoner authorization for prisoner plaintiffs to proceed.
- If granted IFP status, the fee (excluding the admin fee) is collected via installment deductions from the prisoner’s account by the correctional facility.
- Failure to comply with the payment or IFP application requirement within 30 days will result in dismissal of the case.
- The order also notes that appeals would not be taken in good faith, denying IFP status for appeal purposes.
Issues:
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Gardner can proceed without paying fees | Gardner seeks to file as pro se, did not pay fees or file IFP application | Not present; administrative action | Gardner must pay fee or submit IFP application |
| Requirements under Prison Litigation Reform Act | Gardner did not submit required documentation | Not present; administrative action | Prisoners must file both IFP and authorization |
| Consequence for failing to comply | Gardner did not address | Not present; administrative action | Dismissal if no compliance in 30 days |
| IFP status for appeal purposes | Gardner did not request | Not present; administrative action | Denied; appeal not taken in good faith |
Key Cases Cited
- Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962) (clarifies standard for good faith in appeals from IFP denials)
