History
  • No items yet
midpage
Garcon v. Agency for Health Care Administration
96 So. 3d 472
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Robinson sustained a gunshot injury causing total and permanent disability.
  • Medicaid paid $244,590.57 for past medical expenses.
  • Robinson received a $1,000,000 third-party settlement allocated to medical expenses only.
  • Issue concerns Medicaid’s lien on the settlement and extent of recovery.
  • Trial court held the lien equals the amount expended by Medicaid, consistent with §409.910(1)(11)(f).
  • Appellant argued the lien is pre-empted by federal law and that settlements should be allocated between medical and non-medical damages; court rejected this.
  • Court affirmed the trial court’s interpretation and application of the statute to recover Medicaid expenses from the settlement.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Preemption of §409.910(1)(11)(f) by federal law Ahlborn preempts the Florida statute Statute survives preemption as a Florida special rule Not pre-empted; statute enforceable

Key Cases Cited

  • Arkansas Dept. of Health & Human Servs. v. Ahlborn, 547 U.S. 268 (U.S. 2006) (Medicaid lien limited to past medical expenses does not impermissibly invade entire awards)
  • Russell v. Agency for Health Care Admin., 23 So.3d 1266 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (Florida authority upholding §409.910(1)(11)(f) as compatible with federal law)
  • Storey ex rel. Storey v. Hickcox, 44 So.3d 600 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (Affirmed application of Medicaid lien rules in settlements)
  • Smith v. Agency for Health Care Admin., 24 So.3d 590 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (Support for Florida lien framework)
  • Scharba v. Everett L. Braden, Ltd., 2010 WL 1380121 (M.D. Fla. 2010) ((ignored WL since no official reporter))
  • R.J. v. Azia, 2010 WL 5140591 (S.D. Fla. 2010) ((WL case cited for preemption discussion))
  • Tristani ex rel. Karnes v. Richman, 652 F.3d 360 (3d Cir. 2011) (Affirmation of state’s ability to adopt special lien rules)
  • Andrews ex rel. Andrews v. Haygood, 362 N.C. 599, 669 S.E.2d 310 (2008) (Support for special lien rules within state law)
  • Hudelson v. State Dep’t of Health & Welfare, 146 Idaho 439, 196 P.3d 905 (Idaho 2008) (Illustrates federal-state balance in Medicaid recovery rules)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Garcon v. Agency for Health Care Administration
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 5, 2012
Citation: 96 So. 3d 472
Docket Number: No. 3D11-925
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.