Galvin v. Galvin
288 Ga. 125
| Ga. | 2010Background
- Thomas R. Galvin petitioned for downward modification of child support and increased visitation with his child; Wendy L. Galvin had primary physical custody and decision-making authority in the 2007 divorce judgment.
- In 2008 and 2009, Galvin sought modifications citing his unemployment and mother’s income increase; trial court later modified support downward and increased visitation.
- Trial court imputed Galvin’s income at $2,500 monthly due to training as a paralegal and perceived lack of job search efforts, while noting mother earned $2,500 monthly.
- The court found a material change in circumstances for support but not for custodial arrangements, and adopted a parenting plan favorable to mother’s visitation schedule.
- The modification order set Galvin’s support at $692 monthly and preserved mother’s health/dental insurance arrangement, with allocated uninsured medical expenses.
- This appeal, granted under OCGA § 5-6-35(j), challenges retroactivity, income imputation, and insurance/expense allocations as part of the child support modification.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retroactivity of downward modification | Galvin: upwardly argued retroactive effect to Feb 2008 | Galvin: statute OCGA § 19-6-15(j) applies retroactively | No retroactivity; modification effective upon judgment, not date of petition |
| Imputation of income | Galvin: unemployment prevents imputation | Income imputed given prolonged unemployment and efforts absence | Court did not err in imputing income to Galvin |
| Mother’s reported income including tips | Galvin: tips not included; incorrect total | Evidence shows total monthly income including tips as $2,400.60 | No error; evidence supports reported amount |
| Health and dental insurance modification | Galvin: insurance costs should be modified proportionally | No evidence to modify insurance obligations | No modification; court acted within discretion |
| Custodial/visitation arrangement impact | Galvin sought changes to reduce costs via daycare/custody changes | No material change in circumstances warranting different custody | Court did not err in not altering custodial plan beyond visitation |
Key Cases Cited
- Hendrix v. Stone, 261 Ga. 874 (1992) (modification timing governs effective date of support changes)
- Herrin v. Herrin, 287 Ga. 427 (2010) (emphasizes evidence of unemployment and lack of job-search efforts for imputing income)
- Bankston v. Lachman, 286 Ga. 459 (2010) (income potential vs. actual earnings in imputation analysis)
- Johnson v. Johnson, 284 Ga. 366 (2008) (health insurance decisions within trial court's discretion)
