History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fox v. Rice
2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 2055
| Ind. Ct. App. | 2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Fox appeals summary judgment for WCCC on false arrest, false imprisonment, Indiana constitutional rights, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Fourth Amendment claims.
  • ITCA tort claim notice deadline is 180 days after the loss, tolled if incapacitated; Fox filed after the 180 days expired.
  • Fox was held under a 1998 modified probation (home detention) while later incarcerated for 1998 child molestation; court never tied those orders to the WCCC hold.
  • In 2004 Fox was detained by WCCC on a still-valid hold, challenged by Fox but with no clear court order releasing him; warrant issued Sept. 21, 2004.
  • Fox released on Nov. 4, 2004; Tort Claims Notice filed May 3, 2005; district court granted summary judgment to WCCC; Fox appeals.
  • Court holds ITCA bar applies, continuing wrong doctrine and incapacitation arguments fail, and federal claim lacks genuine issue of material fact.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Timeliness of ITCA tort notice Fox argues notice starts Nov. 4, 2004 when released. Notice accrued on the wrongful detention began Sept. 21, 2004 when served with arrest warrant. Notice period started Sept. 21, 2004; expired before May 3, 2005.
Incapacitation tolling Fox was incapacitated during imprisonment, tolling 180-day deadline. Incarceration alone does not establish incapacity; no evidence of actual incapacity. Incapacity not proven; ITCA bar remains.
Continuing wrong doctrine Ongoing imprisonment constitutes continuing wrong starting earlier. Discovery of a cause of action does not extend ITCA period if facts suggest otherwise. Continuing wrong doctrine inapplicable.
Federal Fourth Amendment claim viability WCCC's acts caused false imprisonment; municipal liability may attach. No policy, practice, or final policymaker authority shown to impose liability. No genuine issue of material fact; WCCC not liable; judgment affirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384 (U.S. 2007) (end of false imprisonment begins when legal process starts, not release date)
  • Johnson v. Blackwell, 885 N.E.2d 25 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (imprisonment ends false imprisonment when service of process occurs)
  • Cantrell v. Morris, 849 N.E.2d 488 (Ind.2006) (municipal liability standards for official policy or custom)
  • Walker v. Sheahan, 526 F.3d 973 (7th Cir.2008) (municipal liability: policy, custom, or final policymaker authority)
  • Crowe, Chizek, & Co. v. Oil Tech., Inc., 771 N.E.2d 1203 (Ind.Ct.App.2002) (evidence required for policy-based liability must show more than a single incident)
  • McGill v. Indiana Dept. of Corr., 636 N.E.2d 199 (Ind.Ct.App.1994) (incapacitation defense under ITCA requires particular facts; not per se)
  • Wragg v. Thornton, 604 F.3d 464 (7th Cir.2010) (final policymaking authority factors in municipal liability analysis)
  • Calhoun v. Ramsey, 408 F.3d 375 (7th Cir.2005) (absence of policy or practice evidence requires caution in inferring liability)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Fox v. Rice
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 4, 2010
Citation: 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 2055
Docket Number: 54A01-1003-PL-97
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.