History
  • No items yet
midpage
220 Cal. App. 4th 1152
Cal. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Fowler, suing on behalf of himself and a putative class, challenges HOA transfer fees imposed by M&C Association Management Services, Inc. and Associations, Inc. (M&C).
  • Fees were charged as part of a Resale Disclosure Certificate for a Diablo Grande home purchase and were paid through escrow.
  • Plaintiff purchased from a bank that acquired title via foreclosure, so the prior owner did not notify the HOA of the transfer.
  • M&C did not record the notice of transfer fees as required by Civil Code section 1098.5, subdivision (b).
  • The trial court granted summary judgment, holding the fees were not transfer fees within section 1098, and thus no notice was required.
  • The appellate court affirmed, concluding the transfers fees were authorized by the Davis-Stirling Act and not subject to the recording requirement.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the notice requirement applies to the fees here Fowler asserts the fees are transfer fees needing notice under 1098.5(b). M&C contends the fees are not transfer fees under 1098 and thus no notice is required. No notice required; fees not transfer fees under 1098.
Whether Davis-Stirling Act authorizes these fees Fees exceed actual costs; not authorized by 1368(c)(1)(A). Fees are authorized as costs of transfer services and may include vendor profit. Fees fall within authorization; not prohibited by 1368.
Whether M&C, as HOA agent, can charge these fees Agent charges violate the statutory limits and are not binding on the HOA’s authority. As HOA agent, M&C may perform transfer services authorized by the HOA. M&C’s charges valid as agent of HOA; authority extends to transfer services.

Key Cases Cited

  • Berryman v. Merit Property Mgmt., Inc., 152 Cal.App.4th 1544 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007) (vendor profits permitted; association costs include services and profits)
  • Brown v. Professional Community Mgmt., Inc., 127 Cal.App.4th 532 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005) (association costs may include vendor fees; managing agent can charge for services)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Fowler v. M&C Ass'n Management Services, Inc.
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Oct 28, 2013
Citations: 220 Cal. App. 4th 1152; 163 Cal. Rptr. 3d 717; 2013 WL 5787963; 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 859; A137462
Docket Number: A137462
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
Log In
    Fowler v. M&C Ass'n Management Services, Inc., 220 Cal. App. 4th 1152