History
  • No items yet
midpage
Foushee v. Appalachian State Univ.Â
255 N.C. App. 468
| N.C. Ct. App. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Belinda Foushee, as executor of Anneka Foushee’s estate, filed a wrongful-death claim under the North Carolina Tort Claims Act by submitting a Form T-1 to the NC Industrial Commission on April 7, 2016.
  • Appalachian State University moved to dismiss on June 10, 2016, arguing the ten-year statute of repose barred the claim and thus the State lacked waiver of sovereign immunity; motion asserted under Rules 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(2).
  • A deputy commissioner denied the motion on June 23, 2016. Appalachian sought immediate review by the Full Commission; the Commission chairman denied immediate review on July 22, 2016 (amended), concluding the order was interlocutory and defendant hadn’t shown a substantial right would be lost.
  • Defendant moved for reconsideration (denied) and then filed an interlocutory appeal to the Full Commission on August 25, 2016; plaintiff moved to dismiss that interlocutory appeal.
  • On November 28, 2016 the Full Commission dismissed defendant’s interlocutory appeal, reasoning the Tort Claims Act and Commission rules do not provide for immediate appeal from interlocutory orders; defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the Full Commission’s dismissal of an interlocutory appeal is immediately appealable to the Court of Appeals The appeal is interlocutory and not appealable; dismissal proper. The interlocutory orders affect a substantial right (personal jurisdiction/sovereign immunity/statute of repose) and are immediately appealable. Dismissed: appeal is interlocutory and defendant failed to show a substantial right; appeal to Court of Appeals is not permissible.

Key Cases Cited

  • Goldston v. Am. Motors Corp., 326 N.C. 723 (1990) (general rule that interlocutory orders are not immediately appealable)
  • Veazey v. City of Durham, 231 N.C. 357 (1950) (definition of interlocutory orders)
  • Sharpe v. Worland, 351 N.C. 159 (1999) (explains limited exceptions for immediate appeal: finality as to fewer than all claims or when a substantial right is affected)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Foushee v. Appalachian State Univ.Â
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Sep 19, 2017
Citation: 255 N.C. App. 468
Docket Number: COA17-213
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.