History
  • No items yet
midpage
Founders Insurance Co. v. Walker
2015 IL App (1st) 141301
| Ill. App. Ct. | 2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Morrison purchased a Founders auto policy that included Part I (liability) but not Part III (collision) for her 2010 Hyundai for Mar 1–Sept 1, 2012.
  • Morrison rented a car from Enterprise, declined Enterprise’s optional collision waiver, and the rental was damaged in a hit-and-run while driven by an acquaintance.
  • Enterprise sued Morrison for damage to its rental vehicle; Founders then sued for a declaratory judgment that it had no duty to defend or indemnify Morrison or Walker.
  • Founders denied Morrison’s physical-damage claim because she had not purchased collision coverage under Part III.
  • Founders alternatively argued that even if Part I liability coverage applied, exclusion (j) (excluding property "rented to or in charge of the insured") barred coverage.
  • The trial court granted summary judgment for Founders; the appellate court affirmed based on exclusion (j).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Part I (liability) covers Morrison’s liability for damage to a rental car Founders: liability v. collision distinction means Part I doesn’t cover damage to the rented vehicle because that is collision (Part III) coverage Enterprise/Morrison: Part I covers "property damage arising out of operation ... of non‑owned automobiles," which includes a rented car owned by a third party Court: Part I’s plain language includes liability for damage to a rental car, so Part I would apply
Whether exclusion (j) in Part I excludes coverage for damage to property rented to the insured Founders: exclusion (j) excludes liability for property "rented to or in charge of the insured," so no coverage Enterprise/Morrison: exclusion (j) should not apply to a rental vehicle (argued "property" means real property; "injury" implies persons) Court: exclusion (j) plainly excludes damage to property rented to the insured (including a rental car); exclusion governs, so no coverage

Key Cases Cited

  • Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 154 Ill. 2d 90 (Ill. 1992) (policy construed as whole; ambiguities against insurer)
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Enterprise Leasing Co. of Chicago, 386 Ill. App. 3d 945 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008) (policy interpretation focuses on insured's purchased coverage)
  • Kohen v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 98 Ill. App. 3d 860 (Ill. App. Ct. 1981) (similar exclusion for property rented to insured excludes liability coverage)
  • Welborn v. Illinois Nat'l Cas. Co., 347 Ill. App. 65 (Ill. App. Ct. 1952) (distinguishes collision vs. liability coverage; discusses exclusions)
  • Skorka v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co., 563 A.2d 442 (N.H. 1989) (held "property damage" includes a rental car)
  • Founders Ins. Co. v. Munoz, 237 Ill. 2d 424 (Ill. 2010) (dictionary definitions may be used when policy terms are undefined)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Founders Insurance Co. v. Walker
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Aug 25, 2015
Citation: 2015 IL App (1st) 141301
Docket Number: 1-14-1301
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.