History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fort Cherry School District v. Coppola
37 A.3d 1259
| Pa. Commw. Ct. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Requester sought 2008 and 2009 W-2s and 1099s for four named individuals, with personal information redacted.
  • District initially claimed 1099s did not exist and invoked RTKL extension to delay responding to W-2 portion.
  • During extension, District withheld W-2s claiming they are entirely exempt as return information under 26 U.S.C. §6103 and personal data under RTKL §708(b)(6).
  • OOR ruled W-2s are subject to disclosure with redaction of personal information; relied on Campbell v. Pocono Mt. Sch. Dist to treat W-2s as return information.
  • District appealed to trial court; trial court upheld OOR; District and requester then appealed to Commonwealth Court; only W-2 exemption issue remained.
  • Court holds W-2s are exempt under federal law and reverses the trial court’s decision; 1099 issue deemed waived for the appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Are W-2s exempt under 26 U.S.C. §6103? District: W-2s are return information exempt in their entirety. Coppola: W-2s should be disclosed under RTKL with redactions. W-2s exempt; upheld withholding.
Was the OOR’s handling of the 1099 issue proper given waiver? District: 1099s non-existence should be addressed; OOR properly proceeded. Requester did not challenge 1099 existence; waiver applies. 1099 issue waived; OOR erred in addressing it.
Did the OOR exceed jurisdiction by requiring an affidavit for non-existence? District: affidavit required by OOR was proper. Requester: no need to consider 1099s; jurisdiction limited to W-2s. OOR erred; jurisdiction ends with final determination.

Key Cases Cited

  • Campbell v. Pocono Mt. Sch. Dist., 25 A.3d 1318 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2011) (W-2s qualify as return information exempt under §6103)
  • Dep’t of Corr. v. Office of Open Records, 18 A.3d 429 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2011) (requester's grounds must be stated; burden on agency)
  • SWB Yankees, LLC v. Wintermantel, 999 A.2d 672 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2010) (agency bears burden to prove exemption)
  • Kaplin v. Lower Merion Twp., 19 A.3d 1209 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2011) (scope of review in RTKL cases)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Fort Cherry School District v. Coppola
Court Name: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Feb 23, 2012
Citation: 37 A.3d 1259
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Commw. Ct.